Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 7719 ALL
Judgement Date : 27 October, 2014
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 27 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 200 of 2006 Revisionist :- Makhanchu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- Mahip Singh,D.K.Maurya,K.K.Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J.
List is revised. No one appears on behalf of the revisionist.
The present criminal revision has been filed by Makhanchu against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 5.12.2005 in Criminal Appeal No. 116 of 2002 whereby revisionist was convicted under section 326 IPC and sentenced to 3 years simple imprisonment alongwith fine of Rs. 5000/- and in default 3 months rigorous imprisonment and under section 324 IPC to 1 year simple imprisonment. Both the sentences were to run concurrently. There is nothing on record to indicate that the revisionist was ever bailed out and in all probability he must have served out his sentence, rendering this revision as infructuous.
The revision is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 27.10.2014
SKS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!