Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 7505 ALL
Judgement Date : 13 October, 2014
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 41 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2911 of 2014 Revisionist :- Ghan Shyam Mishra And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Kamlesh Shukla,Prashant Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate Hon'ble Vikram Nath,J.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionist.
The Court below has rejected the application for discharge by the impugned order. The argument advanced is that the applicant possessed a valid licence for selling fertilizers, pesticides etc. and therefore, the seizure of such goods could not make out an offence. From the material on record it appears that the applicant was also charged for counterfeiting under sections 485, 486 and 487 IPC
No case for interference in revisional jurisdictional is made out.
Revision is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 13.10.2014
RPS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!