Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 8833 ALL
Judgement Date : 19 November, 2014
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 41 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 47846 of 2014 Applicant :- Smt. Sudha Devi And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mithilesh Kumar Shukla,Avanish Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Vikram Nath,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned A.G.A.
I do not find any merit in this application warranting interference in inherent jurisdiction.
At this stage the learned counsel for the applicants made a prayer that the bail application of the applicants in Case Crime No.52 of 2010, under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 409, 504 IPC, P.S. Eka, District Firozabad be ordered to be considered expeditiously, if possible on the same day by the Court below.
After hearing learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. this application is finally disposed of with a direction that if the applicants appear and surrender before the Court below within two weeks from today and apply for bail, then their bail application shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid down by the Seven Judges' decision of this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P., reported in 2004 (57) ALR-290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P., reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) after hearing the Public Prosecutor in the aforesaid crime number for the aforesaid offences.
Order Date :- 19.11.2014
RPS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!