Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 8464 ALL
Judgement Date : 13 November, 2014
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 34 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 526 of 1995 Revisionist :- Satish Kumar Dubey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & Another Counsel for Revisionist :- S.D. Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :-Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revised. None appeared to press this revision. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. This criminal revision under section 401 read with section 397 Cr.P.C. has been filed aggrieved by the order dated 2.2.1995 passed in Original Suit No. 85 of 1992 under section 125 Cr.PC. Having gone through the impugned judgment, I do not find any manifest error or otherwise illegality so as to warrant interference.
3. Dismissed.
4. Certify this judgment to the lower court immediately.
Order Date :- 13.11.2014
SKS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!