Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 1492 ALL
Judgement Date : 5 May, 2014
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 25441 of 2014 Petitioner :- Gajendra Singh & 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. & 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- S.K. Tyagi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mahesh Narain Singh Hon'ble Vineet Saran,J.
Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J.
At the outset, Sri S.K. Tyagi, learned counsel for the petitioners states that after the filing of this petition, the relief as has been prayed for, has been granted to the petitioners and as such, the petitioners do not wish to press this petition.
Sri Mahesh Narain Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 has stated that though he does not have any objection to the dismissal of this petition as withdrawn but he has no instructions as to whether any such relief as prayed for, has been given to the petitioners by the authority.
This writ petition is accordingly dismissed as not pressed. No order as to costs.
Order Date :- 5.5.2014
ABhisHEK
(Naheed Ara Moonis, J.) (Vineet Saran, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!