Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 270 ALL
Judgement Date : 27 March, 2014
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION DEFECTIVE U/S 372 CR.P.C (LEAVE TO APPEAL) No. - 23 of 2014 Applicant :- Raj Kumar Sharma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhir Dixit,Krishna Srivastava,Smt. Richa Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Apul Misra Hon'ble Ravindra Singh,J.
Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P. and Sri Apul Misra, counsel for the accused respondents.
Learned A.G.A. files the counter affidavit. Learned counsel for the appellant prays for and is granted ten days time to file its rejoinder affidavit.
It is reported that due to inadvertent mistake in the order dated 5.2.2014, it was directed that this case be listed with criminal revision no. 1984/2011, in fact the correct number of criminal revision is 1984/2010.
List along with the record of connected criminal revision no. 1984/2010 on 22.4.2014.
Order Date :- 27.3.2014
Monika
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!