Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 4331 ALL
Judgement Date : 12 August, 2014
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 38334 of 2014 Petitioner :- Mohammad Imran Respondent :- D.D.C. And 2 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Ayub Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J.
It has been submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Sambhal (the DDC) has passed the order on the ground that plot no. 327 is valuable roadside land.
Relying upon a map filed with the petition, it is submitted that the land of chak no. 174 is situate between the plot no. 327 and the road and therefore the basis of the impugned order is factually incorrect.
Issue notice to respondent nos. 2 and 3 by registered post AD. Steps be taken within a week.
Until further orders of this Court, the effect and operation of the impugned order dated 21.12.2013 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Sambhal shall remain stayed if not already given effect to on the spot.
Order Date :- 12.8.2014
SKS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!