Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Commissioner Commercial Tax vs M/S Prem Prakash Gupta & Brothers
2014 Latest Caselaw 4241 ALL

Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 4241 ALL
Judgement Date : 11 August, 2014

Allahabad High Court
The Commissioner Commercial Tax vs M/S Prem Prakash Gupta & Brothers on 11 August, 2014
Bench: Surya Prakash Kesarwani



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 4
 

 
Case :- SALES/TRADE TAX REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 69 of 2014
 

 
Applicant :- The Commissioner Commercial Tax
 
Opposite Party :- M/S Prem Prakash Gupta & Brothers
 
Counsel for Applicant :- S.C.
 

 
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.

Ref: Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application

1.     Heard Sri B.K. Pandey, learned Standing Counsel for the applicant.

2.     This revision has been filed beyond 1 days of limitation along with delay condoanation application and affidavit explaining the delay.

3.     Cause shown is sufficient.

4.     Delay Condonation application is allowed.

Order Date :- 11.8.2014

Mukesh

(Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. )

Case :- SALES/TRADE TAX REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 69 of 2014

Applicant :- The Commissioner Commercial Tax

Opposite Party :- M/S Prem Prakash Gupta & Brothers

Counsel for Applicant :- S.C.

Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.

Ref: Civil Misc. Amendment Application

1.     Heard Sri B.K.Pandey, learned Standing Counsel for the applicant.

2.     Amendment application is allowed.

3.     Let necessary amendment be incorporated within a week.

Order Date :- 11.8.2014

Mukesh

(Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. )

Case :- SALES/TRADE TAX REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 69 of 2014

Applicant :- The Commissioner Commercial Tax

Opposite Party :- M/S Prem Prakash Gupta & Brothers

Counsel for Applicant :- S.C.

Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.

1.     Heard Sri B.K.Pandey, learned Standing Counsel for the applicant.

2.     Admit on the following questions of law :

(i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Commercial Tax Tribunal as well as first appellate authority were legally justified in allowing the benefit of I.T.C. on the purchase made from unregistered farmers on which no tax has been paid by the opposite party dealer on these purchases ?

(ii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case authorities below was legally justified in holding the goods produced namely Ethanol, Leena Loom, Tarpene Essential Oil, and its derivatives are liable to tax as unclassified commodity in schedule -V of U.P. Value Added Tax Act ?

3.     Issue notice to the respondents returnable at an early date.

4.     Steps be taken within a week by registered/speed post.

5.     List after expiry of four weeks.  

Order Date :- 11.8.2014

Mukesh

(Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. )

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter