Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 957 ALL
Judgement Date : 16 April, 2014
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 20236 of 2014 Petitioner :- Israrul Haq Respondent :- D.D.C. And 6 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Farooq,Siddhartha Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Diwakar Singh Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J.
It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that although his appeal no. 4110 was allowed by the Settlement Officer, Consolidation on the ground that he was entitled to the area of plot no. 1923/8 which was valuable road side land yet in the correction table prepared, the modification was so made that the land allotted to the petitioner does not abut the road, it was therefore that a revision was filed which has been dismissed saying that since the appeal had been allowed the petitioner is not aggrieved party. The petitioner has thus been allotted a chak which does not abut road despite the reasoning of the Settlement Officer, Consolidation that he is entitled to the same.
Matter requires consideration.
Issue notice to respondent nos. 3 to 6 by registered post A.D., returnable at an early date.
Steps may be taken within a week.
List on the date fixed in the notice.
Order Date :- 16.4.2014
Priyanka
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!