Prempata vs State Of U.P.
2013 Latest Caselaw 6712 ALL

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
 
 

?Court No. - 28
 

 
Case :- BAIL No. - 6595 of 2013
 

 
Applicant :- Prempata
 
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Sheo Prakash Singh,Suresh Singh
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate
 

 
Hon'ble Ravindra Singh,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is  mother-in-law of the deceased. The marriage of the deceased was solemnized one year prior the alleged incident. the cause of the death was hanging. The applicant was living separately. The statement of the deceased's brother has been recorded under section 161 Cr.P.C. in which  indirectly he admitted that the applicant was living separately. The case of the applicant is distinguishable with the case of other co-accused person. Therefore, the applicant may be released on bail.

After considering the facts, circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without entering into the merits of the case, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Let the applicant Prempata involved in case crime no.  38 of 2013 under Sections 498-A, 304-B I.P.C. and section 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Kaudia, District Gonda be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:

*That the applicant shall not tamper with the evidence.

*That she shall report to the court of C.J.M. concerned in the first week of each month to show her good conduct  and behaviour till the conclusion of the trial.

In case of default, in any of the above mentioned conditions, the bail granted to the applicant shall be deemed cancelled and she shall be taken into custody forthwith.

Order Date :- 29.10.2013

RPD