Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 6504 ALL
Judgement Date : 21 October, 2013
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 39 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 57263 of 2013 Petitioner :- Aparna Construction & Suppliers Thru Proprietor Respondent :- State Of U.P.& Another Counsel for Petitioner :- P.N.Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J.
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Petitioner who is a contractor is complaining before this Court that as far as she is concerned, the contract work in question has been got executed and inspite of the same, payment has not been made and to the contrary the contract in question itself has been cancelled.
This much has been accepted by the petitioner that under the terms and condition of the contract, there is a provision for getting disputes settled inter se by way of approaching arbitrator.
Once such is the factual situation that for settling disputes arising out of contract, the parties have agreed for approaching the forum of arbitration, then it would be not at all appropriate to entertain the writ petition in question and not relegate the petitioner to the remedy as already agreed upon by the parties concerned i.e by way of approaching arbitrator.
The writ petition is dismissed accordingly.
Order Date :- 21.10.2013
IB
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!