Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 2183 ALL
Judgement Date : 15 May, 2013
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 27 Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 632 of 2007 Petitioner :- Mukta Prasad (Since Deceased) & Others Respondent :- Arun Kumar Petitioner Counsel :- S. Niranjan,Dharam Pal Singh Respondent Counsel :- Prem Babu Verma,P.P. Chaudhary Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
Application No.322767 of 2012
This application has been filed by the respondent/applicant with the specific prayer that the joist (Dhanni) supporting the mud roof of the disputed construction has been damaged during the rainy season in the month of September, 2012. The defendant respondent is residing therein and as such it may cause serious harsh ship. Counter affidavit has been filed to the application.
Heard Sri Dharam Pal Singh, learned counsel for the appellant ad Sri P.P. Chaudhary, learned counsel for the applicant respondent.
This is an admitted appeal and status quo order with regard to 'Sahan' shown in the map as 'A,B,C,D' in the plaint map has been passed by this Court on 11.7.2007.
The dispute is with regard to construction raised by the defendant respondent in the 'Sahan' of plaintiff's house shown by letters 'A,B,B,D' in the map. The defendant respondent has illegally encroached upon the 'Sahan'.
In view of the assertions made by both the parties, this Court directs that the defendant respondent may get the temporary roof of the disputed construction repaired. However, he will not raise any other construction changing the nature of disputed structure and further will not change the nature of roof in existence which is admittedly a temporary structure. The repairs made by the defendant respondent shall be subject matter of result of present appeal.
The application is disposed of accordingly.
Order Date :- 15.5.2013
P.P.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!