Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 2121 ALL
Judgement Date : 15 May, 2013
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 4 Case :- U/S 482/378/407 No. - 806 of 2005 Petitioner :- Vijay Pal Singh And 2 Ors. Respondent :- State Of U.P.& Another. Petitioner Counsel :- Anil K.Tripathi,Vijay Kumar Asthana Respondent Counsel :- Govt.Advocate Hon'ble Ravindra Singh,J.
List is revised.
Learned counsel for the applicants is not present.
Heard learned A.G.A.
This application has been filed with a prayer to quash the order dated 8.11.2000 passed by learned VI-A.C.J.M. Sultanpur in Criminal Case No. 2764 of 2003 whereby the learned Magistrate concerned has rejected the final report and summoned the applicants to face the trial for the offence under section 379 IPC and 4/10 U.P. PT. Act.
From the perusal of the record it appears that the learned Magistrate has perused the case diary and considered the statement recorded under sections 200 and 202 Cr.P.C. also. The learned Magistrate concerned has adopted a mixed proceedure for taking the cognizance. The proceedure adopted by the learned Magistrate concerned is not a proper procedure. Therefore, the impugned order dated 8.11.2000 is illegal, the same is set aside.
However, learned Magistrate concerned is directed to pass a fresh order after hearing the parties concerned.
The interim order dated 20.4.2005 is hereby vacated.
Accordingly this application is disposed of.
Let a copy of this order be communicated to learned Magistrate concerned, Gonda forthwith for the compliance.
Order Date :- 15.5.2013
RPD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!