Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hadis vs Doka (Deceased) And 3 Others
2013 Latest Caselaw 1616 ALL

Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 1616 ALL
Judgement Date : 2 May, 2013

Allahabad High Court
Hadis vs Doka (Deceased) And 3 Others on 2 May, 2013
Bench: Sibghat Ullah Khan



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 4
 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24564 of 2013
 
Petitioner :- Hadis
 
Respondent :- Doka (Deceased) And 3 Others
 
Petitioner Counsel :- S.A. Lari
 
Hon'ble Sibghat Ullah Khan,J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

O.S. no.206 of 1985 Doka Vs. Hadis was dismissed on 4.4.1989 by the following order:

"None present nor steps taken

Order

Suit is dismissed for non compliance."

(Learned counsel for the defendant petitioner states that earlier plaintiff had been directed to pay deficiency in court fees.) Thereafter restoration application was filed under Order IX Rule 4, C.P.C. on 7.7.1989 i.e. after three months. The said application has been allowed on 8.5.2009 by Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) Kasya, Kushinagar. The case had been registered as misc. case no.58 of 1991. Against the said order petitioner filed Civil Revision no.53 of 2009 Hadis Vs. Raj Kishore and others A.D.J. Court no.3, Kushinagar dismissed the revision on 21.2.2013 hence this writ petition.

The argument of learned counsel for the petitioner is that restoration application under Order IX Rule 4 C.P.C. was not maintainable. Nomenclature is not decisive. The other argument is that application was not accompanied by delay condonation application. In the restoration application it was mentioned that the house of the plaintiff had been burnt and he was ill. Even though separate application for delay condonation was not filed however in the restoration application sufficient explanation for delay had been given. The reliance of learned counsel for the petitioner on Supreme Court Judgment reported in Ragho Singh Vs. Mohan Singh 2000 Law Suit (SC)667 is misplaced.That was a case where appeal had been filed beyond time without delay condonation application. Moreover as on 4.4.1989 defendant petitioner was himself absent.

I do not find least error in the impugned orders. Writ petition is dismissed.

However it is shocking that restoration application remained pending for 20 years. Learned District Judge Kushinagar at Padarauna is directed to immediately take remedial steps and put his District in order.

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to District Judge Kushinagar at Padaurana. Copy of this order may also be placed before Hon. the Administrative Judge concerned.

Order Date :- 2.5.2013/vkg

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter