Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Natthi vs Sunil Kumar Singh, S.D.M.
2013 Latest Caselaw 931 ALL

Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 931 ALL
Judgement Date : 15 April, 2013

Allahabad High Court
Natthi vs Sunil Kumar Singh, S.D.M. on 15 April, 2013
Bench: Sunita Agarwal



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 40
 

 
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1802 of 2013
 

 
Petitioner :- Natthi
 
Respondent :- Sunil Kumar Singh, S.D.M.
 
Petitioner Counsel :- Uma Nath Pandey
 

 
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

Learned counsel for the applicant   is permitted to implead  the present  SDM, Sikandrabad, District  Bulandshahar as one of the respondents  during course of the  day.

This contempt application has been filed for alleged non-compliance of order dated 17.3.2011 passed by this Court whereby a direction was issued to the SDM, Sikandrabad, District Bulandshahar to decide the application dated 19.6.2010 filed by the applicant under Section 146(1) Cr.P.C. in case no. 1 of 2011 pending in his Court.

Learned counsel for the applicant has brought on record the order sheet of case no. 1 of 2011 and has submitted that by the order dated 8.9.2011 the then SDM instead of complying with the direction given by this Court had consigned the application to record on the ground that no evidence was produced under Section 145(1) Cr.P.C.

He further drew attention of the Court to the order dated 7.3.2013 passed by the reivisional court whereby the order dated 8.9.2011 passed by the then SDM, Sikandrabad, District Bulandshahar was set aside and further direction was given to decide the application under Section 146(1) Cr.P.C. at the earliest in compliance of the directions of this Court.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that present  SDM in his reply to the explanation  submitted that he  took charge only on 11.1.2013 and therefore may not be held responsible for the  act of his predecessor. 

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,  opposite party no. 2  i.e.  the present  SDM  is directed to  comply with the  order  dated 17.3.2011 within a period of  three weeks from the  date  a certified copy of this order is produced  before him. 

Applicant  shall supply certified copy of the order  passed today as also  the order  dated 17.3.2011  passed  in  application  under  Section 482 Cr.P.C.  before  opposite party no. 2  within  ten days.

List on 10th July, 2013.

Order Date :- 15.4.2013

P.P.

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter