Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 1438 ALL
Judgement Date : 26 April, 2013
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 23 Case :- REVIEW PETITION No. - 112 of 2003 Petitioner :- Jagdish Prasad Verma Inre:-91 (S/S)1990 Respondent :- District Inspector Of School, Lakhimpur Kheri And 3 Ors Petitioner Counsel :- Prashant Srivastava,Manish Kumar,Shailendra Srivastava Respondent Counsel :- R.K. Srivastava,Manish Kumar,Rakesh Nigam,S B Pandey,Sanjay Srivastava,Sharad Tiwari,Shyam Mohan Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J.
Sri Jagdish Prasad verma has applied for review of the judgment and order of this Court dated 11.11.2002 deciding writ petition no. 91 (S/S) of 1990 Ram Chandra Vs. District Inspector of Schools Kheri and others.
The applicant was not a party in the above writ petition.
Learned Standing counsel has taken an objection that a stranger to the writ petition can not apply for review of the judgment and order passed in the writ petition.
I find that the rights of the petitioner are not affected by the aforesaid decision and therefore the review on behalf of the applicant who was not party to the writ petition is not maintainable and is accordingly rejected.
Order Date :- 26.4.2013
SKS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!