Wednesday, 29, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Raisunnisha vs State Of U.P.
2012 Latest Caselaw 5270 ALL

Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 5270 ALL
Judgement Date : 18 October, 2012

Allahabad High Court
Raisunnisha vs State Of U.P. on 18 October, 2012
Bench: S.C. Agarwal



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 47
 

 
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12123 of 2012
 

 
Petitioner :- Raisunnisha
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.
 
Petitioner Counsel :- Ajit Kumar Singh Solanki
 
Respondent Counsel :- Govt. Advocate,R D Yadav
 

 
Hon'ble S.C. Agarwal,J.

This is the second bail application on behalf of the accused-applicant Raisunnisha involved in Case Crime No. 702 of 2011, under Sections 304, 323, 504, 506, 34 IPC, P.S. Mohammadabad, District- Mau. The first bail application was rejected vide order dated 25.1.2012 passed by Hon'ble Mrs. Jayashree Tiwari, J. The second bail application having been released by her Lordship, this case was ordered to be listed before appropriate Bench by Hon'ble the Chief Justice on 30.5.2012.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the records.

As a new ground, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that identically placed co-accused Kaushar and Haider have been granted bail by different benches of this Court vide order dated 19.7.2012 and 6.9.2012 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 14651 of 2012 and 9731 of 2012.

Since identically placed co-accused have been granted bail, there are sufficient grounds to enlarge the applicant on bail.

Considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, there are sufficient grounds for bail.

Let the applicant Raisunnisha involved in Case Crime No. 702 of 2011, under Sections 304, 323, 504, 506, 34 IPC, P.S. Mohammadabad, District- Mau, be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:-

(a) The applicant shall attend the court according to the conditions of the bond executed by her;

(b) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

Order Date :- 18.10.2012

KU

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter