Allahabad High Court
Pancham Maurya vs State Of U.P.And Others on 10 October, 2012
Bench: Satya Poot Mehrotra, Het Singh Yadav
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 53173 of 2012
Petitioner :- Pancham Maurya
Respondent :- State Of U.P.And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Babu Nandan Singh
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,G.D.Misra
Hon'ble Satya Poot Mehrotra,J.
Hon'ble Het Singh Yadav,J.
We have heard Shri Babu Nandan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 1 to 4 and Shri G.D. Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5 , and perused the record.
The present Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, interalia, praying for quashing the order dated 29.9.2012 (Annexure-7 to the Writ Petition) in respect of the Objections filed by the petitioner against the Voter-List as also for quashing the Notification dated 29.9.2012 (Annexure-8 to the Writ Petition) notifying the final determination of the total number of members, number of Constituencies, extent of the Constituencies and the reserved seats.
From the averments made in the Writ Petition, it is evident that the election process has already started. In the circumstances, we are not inclined to exercise our Writ Jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the matter so as to hinder the on-going election process.
Rule 444 C of the U.P. Cooperative Societies Rules, 1968 framed under the U.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1965 lays down as under:
"444-C. (1) The election in a co-operative society shall not be called in question either by arbitration or otherwise except on the ground that -
(a) the election has not been a fair election by reasons that corrupt practice, bribery or undue influence has extensively prevailed at the election, or
(b) the result of the election has been materially affected -
(i) by improper acceptance or rejection of any nomination, or
(ii) by improper reception, refusal or rejection of voters, or
(iii)by gross failure to comply with the provisions of the Act, the rules or the bye-laws of the society.
Explanation.- For the purpose of this rule corruption, bribery or undue influence shall have the meaning assigned to each under Section 123 of the Representation of People Act, 1951.
(2) A dispute relating to election shall be preferred by the aggrieved party within forty-five days of the declaration of the result."
In view of the provisions of the above-quoted Rule, it is evident that after conclusion of the election, it will be open to the petitioner to challenge the election in the Cooperative Society on the grounds mentioned in the aforesaid Rule.
Proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 70 of the U.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1965 shows that dispute relating to an election may be referred to the Registrar after the declaration of the result of such election.
In view of the above discussion, we are of the opinion that the Writ Petition filed by the petitioner is liable to be dismissed, and the same is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 10.10.2012
safi
