Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 4989 ALL
Judgement Date : 9 October, 2012
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 30 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 52769 of 2012 Petitioner :- Smt. Archana Devi & Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others Petitioner Counsel :- Vidya Dhar Yadav,Vimal Kumar Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,S.N. Ahmad,Sanjay Chaturvedi Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J.
In the present case claim of the petitioner has been non-suited by making precise mention that at no point of time petitioners had ever been appointed after following the procedure as prescribed in 1978 Rules. Confronted with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner comes out with a prayer that reasonable time be accorded for filing supplementary affidavit, giving therein full facts and figures qua the procedure adhered to at the point of time when exercise for appointment of the petitioner had been undertaken.
Request made is accepted. List this case after ten days.
Order Date :- 9.10.2012
SRY
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!