Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 1721 ALL
Judgement Date : 14 May, 2012
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 30 Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 1084 of 2001 Petitioner :- U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. & Others Respondent :- M/S Rimjhim Ispat Ltd. Petitioner Counsel :- Sudhir Agarwal,Mukesh Agrawal(In Person) Respondent Counsel :- H.N. Singh,B.N.Singh Hon'ble Rajes Kumar,J.
Hon'ble Het Singh Yadav,J.
Order on F.A.F.O. Nos. 1084 of 2001 , 1086 of 2001and 1085 of 2001.
It appears that these appeals have been earlier decided by this Court against which Appeals have been filed before the Apex Court. The Apex Court remanded back the matter to this Court for decision.
Shri H.P. Dubey, learned counsel for the appellants states that earlier Shri H.N. Singh and Bibhuti Narain Singh were appearing on behalf of respondent but subsequently the respondent appeared in person.
Under these circumstances, it would be appropriate to issue fresh notice to the respondents .
Issue notice to the respondents. Appellant may take steps to serve respondents by Registered Post within a period of two weeks.
List in the week commencing 23rd July, 2012.
Order Date :- 14.5.2012
R
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!