Wednesday, 29, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Twinkle Sehdev And Another vs State Of U.P. Thru D.M. And Others
2012 Latest Caselaw 1653 ALL

Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 1653 ALL
Judgement Date : 11 May, 2012

Allahabad High Court
Smt. Twinkle Sehdev And Another vs State Of U.P. Thru D.M. And Others on 11 May, 2012
Bench: Vineet Saran, Het Singh Yadav



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 29
 

 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23320 of 2012
 

 
Petitioner :- Smt. Twinkle Sehdev And Another
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru D.M. And Others
 
Petitioner Counsel :- D.K. Dewan,V.K. Maheshwari
 
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.
 

 
Hon'ble Vineet Saran,J.

Hon'ble Het Singh Yadav,J.

Learned Standing Counsel has accepted notices on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 and 2.

Issue notices to the respondent Nos.3 and 4 fixing 17th July, 2012. Steps be taken within a week.

The respondents may file counter affidavit by the next date fixed.

The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that both the petitioners are major  and they have married on their own free will.  Age of the petitioner No.1 Twinkle Sehdevi as per her High School certificate would be over 18 years and the age of the petitioner No.2 Sachin Kumar as per his High School certificate would be over 25 years.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has offered that that the petitioner No.2 Sachin Kumar is ready to deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/- in the name of petitioner No.1(Twinkle Sehdevi) in  fixed deposit of a nationalized bank with the conditions:

1.That said fixed deposit shall not be en-cashed before the period  of three years except with the permission of the Court.

2. The deposit shall be made by the petitioner No.2 in favour of the petitioner No.1 in a nationalized bank within a period of six weeks from today.

3. On the next date fixed,  the petitioner shall file photo stat copy of the receipt of fixed deposit along with an affidavit.

List on 17.07.2012.

Till the next date of listing, unless any F.I.R. has been lodged against the petitioners, it is expected that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners.

Order Date :- 11.5.2012

Pr/-

(Het Singh Yadav, J) (Vineet Saran, J.)

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter