Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tej Bahadur Singh vs The District ...
2012 Latest Caselaw 1478 ALL

Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 1478 ALL
Judgement Date : 9 May, 2012

Allahabad High Court
Tej Bahadur Singh vs The District ... on 9 May, 2012
Bench: Shri Narayan Shukla



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
 
 

?Court No. - 3
 

 
Case :- MISC. SINGLE No. - 2511 of 2012
 

 
Petitioner :- Tej Bahadur Singh
 
Respondent :- The District Magistrate/Collector Distt. Bahraich & Ors.
 
Petitioner Counsel :- N.C. Upadhyay
 
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Vijay Krishna
 

 
Hon'ble Shri Narayan Shukla,J.

Heard Shri  N.C. Upadhyaya, learned counsel for the petitioner  and Shri Vijai Krishna for the  Bank.

The petitioner is aggrieved with the recovery certificate whereby an amount  as due has been shown as Rs.8,08,910/-  along with charges. The petitioner is ready to deposit the same but in instalments to which learned  counsel for the Bank has no objection.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I hereby stay the recovery proceedings initiated against the petitioner, provided the petitioner deposits the whole  amount in ten equal quarterly instalments,the first of which shall be deposited within  three months from today and rest of the amount shall be deposited in nine equal quarterly instalments. The second instalment shall become due on 9th November, 2012 and accordingly the petitioner shall continue to deposit the rest of the installments with up to date interest with the Bank. In case the petitioner has made certain payments and the adjustment of which has not been made in the amount  demanded, it will be open to the petitioner to give proof of the same to the Bank and if such a proof is given, the Bank shall adjust the said amount.

Since no further  action is to be taken by the  Recovery  Officer from the  stage of issuance of recovery citation, he shall not be entitled to  charge any recovery fee.

In case the petitioner commits any default in complying with any of the aforesaid conditions, the benefit of this order would not be available to the petitioner and it will be open to the opposite parties to realize the entire amount due in accordance with law.

With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of finally.

Order Date :- 9.5.2012

Tripathi

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter