Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 1210 ALL
Judgement Date : 1 May, 2012
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 21866 of 2009 Petitioner :- Prakash Chandra Dwivedi Respondent :- High Court Of Judicature At Alld. & Another Petitioner Counsel :- Vashistha Tiwari Respondent Counsel :- Amit Sthalekar,S.C. Hon'ble Rakesh Tiwari,J.
Hon'ble Het Singh Yadav,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties at length.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is neither any preliminary inquiry held nor any case of the vendor from whom he purchased the land measuring 117 Sq. Yard was pending in his Court and that there is no litigation on the said property. He submits that only mistake which he had committed is that before transfer of the land in his favour he did not inform the High Court. He had himself informed the High Court about the purchase of the property and all these things have not been replied in the Counter affidavit.
Per cantra learned counsel for the respondents has relied on para 10 and 14 of the counter affidavit. We find that the aforesaid involvement alleged preliminary inquiry appended in Annexure No. 5 to the writ petition having been addressed and that note appears not correct.We therefore, direct the High Court to produce the entire records with all these inquires as well as the litigation and decision .
List in the next cause list peremptorily.
Order Date :- 1.5.2012
R
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!