Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 3194 ALL
Judgement Date : 25 July, 2012
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 26 Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 3895 of 2012 Petitioner :- Anil Krishan Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Deptt.Of Parti Bhumi Vikas &Ors Petitioner Counsel :- Ajit Verma,Ratnesh Chandra Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Ashutosh Singh Hon'ble Ajai Lamba,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is an employee of Uttar Pradesh Bhumi Sudhar Nigam. The Nigam has taken a decision to enhance the age of retirement from 58 years to 60 years. Even the State Government has tentatively considered the proposal favourably. Final decision in that regard, however, is pending at the end of the State viz. respondent no.1.
Sri Prashant Arora, Advocate, appearing for the respondent-State wants to seek instructions and file a counter affidavit.
List on 31.7.2012.
Order Date :- 25.7.2012
A.Nigam
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!