Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 3095 ALL
Judgement Date : 19 July, 2012
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 26 Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 3792 of 2012 Petitioner :- Aniruddha Rai Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through The Secy.Secondary Edu.Deptt. & Ors. Petitioner Counsel :- Kuldeep Pati Tripathi,S.K. Pandey Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajai Lamba,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner asserts that the petitioner attained the age of superannuation on 30.6.2011, but till date retiral dues have not been paid. No-dues certificate has been issued and the school has removed the objections and has sent the file to the District Inspector of Schools.
Issue notice, returnable on 06.8.2012.
Sri Shukla, Standing Counsel, has put in appearance for opposite party no.3.
Let respondent no.4 be served by way of ordinary process and registered A.D. post.
Let reply be filed as to the reason for not releasing the retiral dues to the petitioner and also why cost be not imposed for delay in release of the retiral dues and, in addition, why interest be not paid to the petitioner on the delayed payment, which would be liable to be deducted from the salary of the officer/official, who has caused delay in releasing the retiral dues..
Order Date :- 19.7.2012
A.Nigam
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!