Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 3559 ALL
Judgement Date : 16 August, 2012
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 30 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 32242 of 2012 Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Singh & Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Another Petitioner Counsel :- Seemant Singh Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,A.K. Yadav Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
In the present case, it is reflected that final result has already been declared on 25.05.2012, and the petitioners are challenging the entire selection. Once the selected candidates have not been impleaded and arrayed as party respondents, the writ petition is bad for non-joinder of necessary parties. Confronted with this situation, Sri Seemant Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner requests that some reasonable time may be accorded to him, so as to enable him to move impleadment application.
Request made is accepted. Ten days' time is accorded to him for this purpose. List this case after ten days on 30.08.2012.
Order Date :- 16.8.2012
SRY
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!