Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 588 ALL
Judgement Date : 20 April, 2012
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 19396 of 2012 Petitioner :- Dr. Poonam Tewari Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Petitioner Counsel :- Alok Mishra Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Uma Nath Singh,J.
Hon'ble S.C. Chaurasia,J.
Order (Oral)
We have heard learned counsel for parties and perused the pleadings of writ petition.
Though at the very outset, on being asked about the outcome of pending writ petition no. 27280 of 2007, learned counsel is not in position to say anything except to point out an interim order dated 15.06.2007 passed in the aforesaid writ petition, yet as there is consensus between learned counsel for parties that the case of petitioner has been approved by the Director, Higher Education, for consideration under Section 31-E of U.P. Higher Education Service Commission Act, 1980, and the same is pending presently with the Secretary concerned, we dispose of the writ petition with direction to decide the matter on merit and in the light of law governing the subject matter, within four weeks from the date of receiving a copy of this order.
Writ petition, thus, stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 20.4.2012
Irfan
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!