Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 4629 ALL
Judgement Date : 14 September, 2011
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 3 Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 6414 of 2011 Petitioner :- Sadhu Ram Respondent :- District Education Committee Throu Its Chairman/ D.M.And Ors Petitioner Counsel :- R.S.Tripathi Respondent Counsel :- Gauri Shankar Maurya Hon'ble Shri Narayan Shukla,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Gauri Shanker Maurya, learned counsel for the opposite party No.2.
The petitioner has prayed for issuing a writ of co-warranto against the opposite party No.4 as well as a writ of mandamus to opposite party No.2 to consider the petitioner's representation contained in annexure No.16 and 17. At this stage the petitioner confines his prayer to the extent to issue direction to opposite party No.2 i.e. the District Basic Education Officer, C.S.M.Nagar to consider the petitioner's representation dated 25th of January, 2011 (Annexure No.16) for his renewal on the post of Shiksha Mitra. Therefore, without entering into the merit of the case, the writ petition is disposed of finally with the direction to the opposite party No.2 to take a decision on the petitioner's representation within three months after receipt of a certified copy of this order.
Order Date :- 14.9.2011
Banswar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!