Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 5625 ALL
Judgement Date : 9 November, 2011
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 39 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 64041 of 2011 Petitioner :- Umesh Chandra Respondent :- Collector,Kanshi Ram Nagar And Another Petitioner Counsel :- R.K.Srivastava,K.K.Srivastava Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajes Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner is the grand son (Nati) of the deceased employee (Nana), who died in harness in the year 1996. The petitioner is claiming the compassionate appointment.
The petitioner's claim for the compassionate appointment cannot be considered as the petitioner does not fall within the ambit of the family as defined under Section 2(c) of the U.P. Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants (Dying-in-Harness) Rules, 1974 inasmuch as the application has been moved in the year 2011, that is, much after the period of five years.
In view of the above, the writ petition is devoid of merits and is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 9.11.2011
bgs/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!