Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 1631 ALL
Judgement Date : 11 May, 2011
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27455 of 2011 Petitioner :- Durjan Lal Respondent :- Commissioner, Bareilly Mandal And Others Petitioner Counsel :- Arun Kumar Verma Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Mahesh Narain Singh Hon'ble Bala Krishna Narayana,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Mahesh Narain Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.4.
The only prayer made by the petitioner is that a writ of mandamus be issued directing the respondent no.1 Commissioner, Bareilly Division, Bareilly to decide the stay application dated 9.3.2011 (annexure no.4) filed by the petitioner in Revision No. 10 of 2000 within a definite period.
To the aforesaid prayer, learned Standing Counsel has no objection provided if some reasonable time is given to the court below to decide the stay application dated 9.3.2011 (annexure no.4) filed by the petitioner in Revision No. 10 of 2000.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's case, this writ petition is finally disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.1 Commissioner, Bareilly Division, Bareilly to decide the stay application dated 9.3.2011 (annexure no.4) filed by the petitioner in Revision No.10 of 2000 in accordance with law after hearing both the sides and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Order Date :- 11.5.2011
Bhaskar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!