Wednesday, 15, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ram Lal Yadav And Others vs State Of U.P.
2011 Latest Caselaw 3269 ALL

Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 3269 ALL
Judgement Date : 29 July, 2011

Allahabad High Court
Ram Lal Yadav And Others vs State Of U.P. on 29 July, 2011
Bench: Shri Kant Tripathi



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 43
 

 
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL U/S 374 CR.P.C. No. - 4365 of 2011
 

 
Petitioner :- Ram Lal Yadav And Others
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.
 
Petitioner Counsel :- L.S. Yadav
 
Respondent Counsel :- Govt. Advocate
 

 
Hon'ble Shri Kant Tripathi,J.

Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned AGA and perused the impugned judgement rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 4, Varanasi  in Session Trial No. 311 of 2007.

Admit. Summon lower court record. 

Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the appellants  were on bail during the trial and never abused the same. The maximum sentence imposed on each of the appellants is of five years under sections 325/149 IPC. It was further contended that all the offences are bailable. It was lastly submitted that in case the appellants are not released on bail, the appeal would,  in due course, become infructuous as there is no hope of an early hearing of the appeal due to heavy dockets.

In my opinion, prima facie, the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the appellants have substance, therefore, it is just and expedient to exercise the discretion in favour of the appellant.

Keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, the severity of punishment and submissions of the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned AGA, I am of the view that that the appellants have made out a case for bail.

Let the appellants Ram Lal Yadav, Shyam Lal Yadav, Kanhaiya Lal Yadav and Vinod Kumar Yadav involved in the aforesaid session trial  be released on bail  during the pendency of the appeal on their each furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned

The realisation of half of the fine shall remain stayed during pendency of the appeal, provided the appellants deposit half of the fine within one month.

On acceptance of bail bonds and personal bonds, the lower court shall transmit photo state copies thereof to this Court for being kept on the record of this appeal.

Let the paper books be prepared.

List the appeal for hearing in due course.

Order Date :- 29.7.2011

shailesh

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter