Wednesday, 15, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sewa Ram Pathak Abhay And Others vs The State Of U.P. And Others
2011 Latest Caselaw 6460 ALL

Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 6460 ALL
Judgement Date : 13 December, 2011

Allahabad High Court
Sewa Ram Pathak Abhay And Others vs The State Of U.P. And Others on 13 December, 2011
Bench: Sudhir Agarwal



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

AFR
 
Court No. - 33
 

 
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 62458 of 2011
 
Petitioner :- Sewa Ram Pathak Abhay And Others
 
Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And Others
 
Petitioner Counsel :- Krishan Ji Khare,Mritunjay Khare
 
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,J.N.Maurya
 

 
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.

01. Heard Sri Krishna Ji Khare, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri J.N. Maurya for the respondents 2 to 5.

02. The only relief sought by the petitioners is that the respondents should get amount of Management's contribution deposited with interest from the petitioners and compute the services rendered by them prior to the institution concerned brought in grant-in-aid for the purpose of retiral benefit like pension etc.

03. The petitioners 1, 2 and 3 while working as Assistant Teacher or Headmaster as the case may be have retired on 30.6.2009, 30.6.2008 and 30.6.2009 respectively while the petitioners 4, 5 and 6 will retire in future.

04. The State Government issued a Government Order dated 26.7.2001 extending period of deposit of Management's contribution along with interest in Government Treasury upto 30.3.2002. On such deposit the period of service rendered in the institution prior to its brining on grant-in-aid would count for pensionary benefit.

05. It is said that management of the institution in which petitioners working did not deposit the said amount. The petitioners however are ready to deposit the said amount from their own but the same is not being permitted by the respondents. Attention is also drawn to this Court's order dated 6.9.2006 in Writ Petition No.75746 of 2006 "Smt. Shanti Solanki Vs. State of U.P. and others", whereby the cut of date provided in the Government order dated 26.7.2001 has already been quashed and this Court allowed deposit of the amount subsequently. The said decision has been followed later on also in several cases including Writ Petition No.42467 of 2007 "Vidhya Ratan Maheshwari Vs. State of U.P. and others" decided on 11.5.2010 and Writ Petition No.74896 of 2010 "Ram Babu Pachauri Vs. State of U.P. and another" decided on 23.12.2010.

05. On behalf of respondents a counter affidavit has been filed, it is stated that the petitioners 1, 2 and 3 have already been paid their retiral benefit including General Provident Fund (G.P.F.). The petitioners 1 and 3 are also getting pension but petitioner 2 has not been granted pension benefit since he has not put 10 years required service from the date of grant-in-aid i.e. on 1.12.1998. It is further stated that from 1.4.2009 a new pension scheme has been made operative and, therefore, the earlier Government Order cannot be pressed into service.

06. A perusal of the Government Order dated 8.4.2009 makes it clear that it would be applicable to only those institutions which have been brought in grant-in-aid after 1.4.2005. It is not the case of respondents that the institution in question namely Rashtriya Vidya Mandir, Purva Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Khawajphool, Rama Bai Nagar (Kanpur Dehat) was taken on grant-in-aid in 2005 i.e. after 1.4.2005. On the contrary it is admitted in paragraph 7 of the counter affidavit that the said institution was taking in grant-in-aid on 1.12.1998. In the circumstances, the Government Order dated 8.4.2009 has no application to the institution in question. A faint attempt was made by referring to U.P. Provisions of General Provident Fund U.P. Rules 1985 but nothing could be shown as to how that would be relevant to form a different opinion then what has already been expressed by this Court in several cases like Vidhya Ratan Maheshwari (supra) and Smt. Shanti Solanki (supra) etc.

07. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the aforesaid decisions as also the fact that petitioners are ready to pay the entire amount of Management's contribution along with interest, this writ petition is allowed in the same terms and conditions as contained in judgment dated 06.09.2006, Smt. Shanti Solanki (supra). If the petitioners deposit Management's contribution together with interest within a period of six weeks from today, the respondents shall proceed to extend benefit of Government Order dated 26.07.2001 to the petitioners as well. The aforesaid exercise will be completed within three months from the date of such deposit and production of a certified copy of this order. No order as to cost.

Order Date :- 13.12.2011

Kpy

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter