Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 3784 ALL
Judgement Date : 16 August, 2011
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 43 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE U/S 374 CR.P.C. No. - 520 of 2011 Petitioner :- Kannauji Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Petitioner Counsel :- Ved Prakash Pandey Respondent Counsel :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Kant Tripathi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the learned AGA and perused the material on record.
With the consent of both the parties, this delay condonation application is being disposed of.
It was submitted on behalf of the appellant that the appellant is in jail and there was none to make arrangement of funds to file the appeal. It was next contended that the appellant, being a poor person, could not make arrangement of the expenses for filing the appeal in time. When he made the arrangement of money, filed the instant appeal without any further delay.
In my opinion the appellant has shown sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal.
The condonation application is allowed.
The delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the appeal is treated to have been filed in time. The office is directed to register the appeal on regular side.
Put up on 24.08.2011 as fresh for hearing on the point of admission.
Order Date :- 16.8.2011
shailesh
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!