Sunday, 19, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Narendra Agrawal vs State Of U.P. And Others
2011 Latest Caselaw 815 ALL

Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 815 ALL
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2011

Allahabad High Court
Narendra Agrawal vs State Of U.P. And Others on 4 April, 2011
Bench: Satya Poot Mehrotra, Rajesh Chandra



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 36
 

 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14215 of 2011
 

 
Petitioner :- Narendra Agrawal
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
 
Petitioner Counsel :- S.C. Tiwari
 
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Mridul Tripathi
 

 
Hon'ble Satya Poot Mehrotra,J.

Hon'ble Rajesh Chandra,J.

    Counter Affidavit on behalf of the respondent no. 2 was filed on 23.3.2011. Thereupon by the Order dated 23.3.2011, time was granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner for filing Rejoinder Affidavit.

    Shri S.C. Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner does not propose to file any Rejoinder Affidavit in reply to the said Counter Affidavit. Therefore, we are proceedings to consider the matter and pass appropriate orders.

    It appears that a checking was made in the premises of the petitioner on 11.3.2011. Copy of the Checking Report has been filed as Annexure-3 to the Writ Petition.

    A Provisional Assessment dated 11.1.2011 (Annexure CA-3 to the Counter Affidavit) was made which was served on the petitioner on 27.1.2011.

    As per the averments made in paragraph 3 D of the Counter Affidavit, the petitioner submitted a Representation dated 28.2.2011 against the aforesaid Provisional Assessment.

    By the Order dated 18.3.2011 (Annexure CA-7 to the Counter Affidavit), the Executive Engineer, Kanpur Electricity Supply Company Limited (respondent no.2) has disposed of the said Representation dated 28.2.2011 submitted by the petitioner. Copy of the Order dated 18.3.2011 has been filed as Annexure CA-7 to the Counter Affidavit.

    We have heard Shri S.C. Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner, leanred Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no.1 and Smt. Mridul Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent no.2, and perused the record.

    Sub-section (3) of Section 126 of the Electricity Act 2003 makes provisions for filing Objections before the Assessing Officer against the Provisional Assessment. The Assessing Officer is required to pass a Final Order of Assessment on such Objections after affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the person concerned.

    Sub-section (1) of Section 127 of the Electricity Act 2003 provides that any person aggrieved by the Final Order made under Section 126 of the Electricity Act 2003 may prefer an Appeal before the Appellate Authority within the period mentioned in the said sub-section 1 of the said Section 127.

    Thus the petitioner has alternative remedy of filing Appeal against the aforesaid Order dated 18.3.2011 passed by the respondent no.2.

    In view of the above, we are of the opinion that the Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground of availability of alternative remedy to the petitioner.

    The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed on the said ground.

Order Date :- 4.4.2011

Ajeet

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter