Latest laws Helping good people to do good things.

RICAGO is a technology platform in Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) space and helps organizations to innovate their compliance systems (regulatory, contractual and internal) by way of simplifying and automating the process.

RICAGO-bangalore-218x150 — RICAGO-bangalore-218×150

RICAGO solutions are used by leading corporations; in diverse industries – such as BFSI, IT/ITeS, healthcare, energy & utilities, food, retail, high-tech and manufacturing – to manage their compliance management programs, contract processes, GST compliance. RICAGO is headquartered in Bengaluru, India.

RICAGO is owned by Clonect Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Location: Koramangala, Bangalore

Job Objective

Responsible for handling the Content research & GRC consulting related activities.

Primary Responsibilities

Preparation of compliance checklists for various laws related to corporate, labour, HR, EHS, Taxation and ensure regular update on the same.
Plan, Execute compliance audits, gap assessments for various clients.
Consulting our clients for Compliance related to corporate, Tax HR, Labour Laws, Industrial Relations Laws, etc.
Preparation of Entire compliance checklist on the basis of applicability of statutes for specific Client.
Understanding the location wise & industry wise compliance requirements of Clients and hence supporting the implementation of the Compliance program.
Update clients on changing Regulatory Regime & its impact on them.
Review of Content Libraries (Compliance Checklists)
Preparation of newsletter on recent Legislation/Notifications/Circulars/Order/Regulations.
Continuous update of Compliance checklist as and when it occurs.
Work closely with Pilots & Implementation team for successful implementation of GRC platform.
Work with Product team for product changes, testing, conceptualize new modules etc.
Any other tasks, as and when assigned

Desired Qualifications

CS Semi-qualified
Preference for Male Candidates as there will be travel

Desired Experience

0-1 year

Knowledge & Skills

Equipped with the Compliance related knowledge
Client Management skills
Good verbal and written communication skills
Association Mode
Trainee period of 6 months. Based on performance, will be confirmed as Employee. Stipend during trainee period : 15-20k per month

How to apply?

Interested Candidates can forward resume to careers@ricago.com.

Facebook Comments

TOI

Demonitisation Diaries 1 pic by sify

Job Hazards

TOI

State of Judiciary by Sandeep Adhwaryu of TOI

Belts are for Dogs

Auto Driver thrashed for no fault, source oneindia [caption id="attachment_97467" align="alignleft" width="621"]

Humour with Latest Laws[/caption]

...as an eminent lawyer you ought to know that your action tantamount to, under Section B, sub-section G.VIX, read along with I.P.C. (A) XI (B), notwithstanding... TOI

Hindu

Alligator vs Litigator

IBN IBN

Women Safety: State of Affairs pic by mangal

TOI

[caption id="attachment_97462" align="alignleft" width="524"]

Painting India Saffron[/caption] Cartoon

TOI

TOI

Four Pillars of Democracy by Satish [caption id="attachment_97477" align="alignleft" width="621"]

UIDAI Leaks[/caption] TOI

Hindu

Pic by Hindu

Women Empowerment and Sports Hindu

Hindu

Hindu

Hindu Hindu

Hindu

TOI

Hindu

State of Two Nations pic by sandeep America First Walk Your own Talk

Hindu

Demonitisation Diaries by sify Hindu

Delivery Boy by Satish

Soaring of Oil Prices pic by indiaone

If India takes One Step, we will take Two ...................by Satish

Demonitisation Diaries 2 pic by sify TOI

Hindu

Tax Reforms by Hindu

Hindu

Time to straighten up pic by TOI TOI

Lawyers Bearing the Burden Literally pic by OMG

Missing the Point pic by english blog

TOI

Hindu

TOI

Hindu Hindu

TOI

Let Justice Be TOI

[caption id="attachment_97474" align="alignleft" width="621"]

Donald Trump’s immigration ban[/caption]

Humour @ Latest Laws: Achhey Din

Acheche Din pic by sify

Check Also

Notification for vacancies released by Office of District and Session Judge (HQ), Delhi for the year 2019

February 20, 2019: The notification has been given in exercise of the powers conferred in the Delhi District Court Establishment (Appointment & Conditions of the Services) Rules, 2012 by High Court of Delhi. Read Notification @latestlaws.com Notification for vacancies released ...

RELIANCE COMMUNICATION LIMITED & ORS. Vs STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS.

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Supreme Court holds the Chairpersons of Reliance Communications Ltd., Reliance Telecom Ltd., and Reliance Infratel Ltd. have breached the undertaking given to the Apex Court and the related orders. The Bench orders the R.Com. Chairman and others to purge the contempt by paying ? 453 crore to Ericsson in four weeks. The bench states if the contemnors fail to make the payments within the specified period, they will undergo a jail term of three months. Court also directs Reliance Communication, Reliance Telecommunication and Reliance Infratel to deposit ?1 crore each to the Apex Court’s registry in four weeks or the Chairman of these companies will have to go an additional jail term of one month. Court clarifies that ?118 crore which has already been deposited by Reliance Group in the Apex Court’s registry, be disbursed to Ericsson within a week. Contempt Petitions are disposed off.

RF Nariman, Vineet Saran, JJ

20/2/2019 View judgement PDF

SMT. SUNITA DEVI AND ANR. Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 302, 109 read with Section 34. The petitioners filed this writ petition for constitution of a court-monitored investigation/SIT to re-investigate the aforesaid cases pertaining to FIR Nos. 221 of 2001 and 228 of 2002 registered at Police Station Pilakhwa, Uttar Pradesh. SC by Order dated 8.2.2018 rejected the prayer for re-investigation of the case pertaining to FIR No. 228 of 2002. This Court directed constitution of a SIT for re-investigation of FIR No.221 of 2001. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and having perused the report of the SIT and the objections filed by the petitioners to the said report, we are of the view that the CBI has to look into the report of the SIT and take a decision in the matter. Writ Petition disposed off.

A.K. Sikri, S. Abdul Nazeer, JJ

20/2/2019 View judgement PDF

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX SHIMLA Vs M/S. AARHAM SOFTRONICS

Finance Act, 2003, Finance Act, 1991 SC observes, in case substantial expansion is carried out as defined in clause (ix) of sub-section (8) of Section 80-IC by such an undertaking or enterprise, within the aforesaid period of 10 years, the said previous year in which the substantial expansion is undertaken would become ‘initial assessment year’, and from that assessment year the assessee shall been entitled to 100% deductions of the profits and gains. Such deduction, however, would be for a total period of 10 years, as provided in sub-section (6). In view of the aforesaid, SC affirms the judgment of the High Court on this issue and dismiss all these appeals of the Revenue. Appeals are allowed.

A.K. Sikri, S. Abdul Nazeer, M.R. Shah, JJ

20/2/2019 View judgement PDF

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Vs. SURESH

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 304 Part II. SC observes, awarding of just and adequate punishment to the wrong doer in case of proven crime remains a part of duty of the Court. The punishment to be awarded in a case has to be commensurate with the gravity of crime as also with the relevant facts and attending circumstances. SC finds that the respondent is convicted of the offence under Section 304 Part II IPC. The punishment so awarded by the Trial Court had itself been leaning towards leniency, essentially in view of the fact that the respondent was 26 years of age at the time of the incident in question. However, the High Court further proceeded to reduce the punishment to the period already undergone (i.e., 3 months and 21 days) while concluding that “no useful purpose would be served in sending appellant back to jail”. Appeal is allowed.

Abhay Manohar Sapre, Dinesh Maheshwari, JJ

20/2/2019 View judgement PDF

TAMIL NADU POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD Vs STERLITE INDUSTRIES (I) LTD. & ORS

Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, National Green Tribunal Act, 2010. Supreme Court holds that the State Government passing an order under Section 18 of the Water Act, not being the subject matter of any appeal under Section 16 of the National Green Tribunal Act, cannot be “judicially reviewed” by the NGT. The National Green Tribunal has no general power of judicial review akin to that vested under Article 226 of the Constitution of India possessed by the High Courts of this country. The Supreme Court clarifies that no appeal was provided against orders made under Section 18 of the Water Act, and the attempt to bring the Tribunal by the backdoor, as it is done in the present case will, therefore, have to be rejected. Appeals disposed off.

R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha, JJ

18/2/2019 View judgement PDF

KRIPAL SINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Indian Penal Code, Section 302 IPC. SC holds, prosecution has proved the case against the present accused/appellant beyond reasonable doubt that the injury on the head of the deceased which was attributed to the accused appellant could in itself be sufficient to cause death and this is what has been considered by the learned trial Court and confirmed by the High Court in appeal. The possibility of over-implication of co-accused Ram Lal, Arjun Singh and Sultan Singh would not in any manner rule out the case of the present appellant and the prosecution has proved beyond reasonable doubt holding him guilty. No hard and fast rule can be laid down as to how much evidence should be appreciated but what is required is that judicial approach has to be cautious in dealing with such evidence; but the plea that such evidence should be rejected because it is partisan cannot be accepted as correct. Appeal is dismissed.

A.M. Khanwilkar, Ajay Rastogi, JJ

15/2/2019 View judgement PDF

EZAJHUSSAIN SABDARHUSSAIN & ANR. Vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Indian Penal Code, Section 302. SC observed, there cannot be a universal rule in laying down the principles of existence of common intention of prior meeting or meetings with pre-arranged plan. It has to be proved either from the conduct or circumstances of any incriminating facts which is missing in the instant case. The High Court has committed a manifest error in holding the appellants guilty under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for participating in the commission of crime. The appellants deserve to be acquitted of the charges filed against them by giving them benefit of doubt. Appeal is allowed.

A.M. Khanwilkar, Ajay Rastogi, JJ

15/2/2019 View judgement PDF

ANJALI BHARDWAJ AND OTHERS Vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Right to Information Act, 2005. The petitioners through this PIL desires transparency and full disclosure of information depicting : (a) definite criteria for such appointments, (b) and such criteria should be made public in advance. SC observes, the petitioners are right in their submissions that there have been undue delays in filling up of these vacancies. We expect that the vacancies shall be filled up, in future, well in time. Supreme Court lays down directions keeping in view the salient purpose for which RTI Act. The Court observes, RTI Act is enacted not only to sub-serve and ensure freedom of speech. On proper implementation, it has the potential to bring about good governance which is an integral part of any vibrant democracy. Attaining good governance is also one of the visions of the Constitution. Appeal is disposed off.

AK Sikri, S Abdul Nazeer, JJ

15/2/2019 View judgement PDF

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Vs PWD AND FOREST EMPLOYEES UNION & ORS.

Gujarat Civil Services (Revision of Pay) Rules, 2009. SC observes, the respondent workers who have been working on daily wage basis cannot be given casual leave which is more than the entitlement extended to regular Government employees. We accept the plea of the appellant that Government Resolution dated October 17, 1988 which provides for 14 days casual leave including 2 days of voluntary/ optional leave is the result of inadvertent transaction error. The casual leave for daily wagers cannot be more than the regular Government employees. We, therefore, hold that the respondents employees shall be entitled to 12 days of casual leave and 2 days of voluntary leave/restricted leave. Appeal is allowed.

A.K. Sikri, S. Abdul Nazeer, M.R. Shah, JJ

15/2/2019 View judgement PDF

MEHBOOB-UR-REHMAN Vs AHSANUL GHANI

Civil Procedure Code, Section 100. SC observes, the plaintiff-appellant has failed to aver and prove his readiness and willingness to perform his part of the contract. The Trial Court made a rather assumptive observation that he had proved such readiness and willingness. Thereafter, the plaintiff sought leave to amend the plaint only when the ground to that effect was taken in the first appeal by the defendant. SC states, the late attempt to improve upon the pleadings of the plaint at the appellate stage was only an exercise in futility in the present case. The High Court has rightly pointed out that no substantial question of law as regards the correctness of the order refusing the application for amendment was formulated. Appeal is dismissed.

Abhay Manohar Sapre, Dinesh Maheshwari, JJ

15/2/2019 View judgement PDF

Latest CaseLaw

JOB POST: CS Freshers @Ricago, Bangalore: Apply by Dec 15

About RICAGO

Job Objective

Primary Responsibilities

Desired Qualifications

Desired Experience

Knowledge & Skills

How to apply?

You May Also Like

Check Also

Leave a Reply Cancel reply