The police can't conclude that there is no truth in a complaint without registering an First Information Report (FIR), the Karnataka HC observed on Monday, hearing a case regarding complaints filed against the police in connection with the anti-CAA protest in Mangaluru in December. Directing the Mangaluru Police Commissioner to file a rejoinder, a division bench comprising Karnataka Chief Justice Abhay Shreeniwas Oka & Justice Hemant Chandangoudar said, “Prima facie, the endorsement will have to be withdrawn as he (Commissioner) cannot come to the conclusion that a complaint is false, without registration of an First Information Report (FIR).”
The court made this observation on an affidavit filed by Mangaluru Police Commissioner Dr P S Harsha in relation to directions issued by the court on a public interest litigation petition filed by freedom fighter HS Doreswamy & former Mangaluru Mayor K Ashraf. When the bench asked what action the Police Commissioner had taken on complaints filed by the petitioner & others against police, Advocate General Prabhuling Navadgi submitted that some complainants were given endorsements as the complaints were a violation of Section 132 of the Criminal Procedure Code (that protects public officials from prosecution under certain circumstances). Others were transferred to Criminal Investigation Department (CID) which is investigating the incident, the AG said.
Senior advocate prof Ravivarma Kumar, representing the petitioners, told the court that two complainants who had been given endorsements included a woman who had accused police of molesting her & assaulting her husband & the other was by K Ashraf, who alleged that police had violated privacy by entering into a hospital. Kumar sought time to file a response to the affidavit filed by the Mangaluru Police Commissioner.
On the endorsements given to the two complainants that ‘no truth was found’, the bench orally observed that such endorsements cannot be issued without registering an First Information Report (FIR) & would have to be withdrawn. Otherwise, it would affect the investigation, the bench said. The bench also said that there can’t be multiple FIRs on the same incident.
Police Commissioner Harsha also said in the affidavit that 20 DVRs had been seized from different locations & CID has sent the footage to the FSL, Bengaluru, for analysis. Advocate General Prabhuling K Navadgi submitted an affidavit on the status of the investigation.
Source Link
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!