BREAKING | Uniform Civil Code needed to address Complexities in Personal Laws, observes SC

Today, the Supreme Court indicated that a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) could provide a lasting solution to the legal complexities arising from multiple personal law regimes in India. Hearing a challenge to provisions of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, the Court suggested that any sweeping reform in this domain must come through legislative action rather than judicial intervention.

The case arose from a petition alleging that certain aspects of Muslim personal law, particularly those governing succession, discriminate against women. The petitioners argued that the 1937 law denies Muslim women equal inheritance rights and sought judicial intervention to address the alleged inequality. Appearing for the petitioners, Advocate Prashant Bhushan contended that inheritance rights constitute a civil matter rather than a protected religious practice and therefore should not be shielded under constitutional guarantees of religious freedom. He suggested that if the 1937 law were struck down, succession could instead be governed by the Indian Succession Act, which provides equal inheritance rights for men and women.

The Bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, and Justice R. Mahadevan expressed reservations about invalidating the statute without a comprehensive legislative alternative. The Bench cautioned that removing the existing framework might create a legal vacuum and could inadvertently affect the rights currently available to Muslim women.

Emphasizing the need for a broader legislative solution, the Court observed, “The answer, as correctly said, is the Uniform Civil Code.” The Bench indicated that reforms concerning personal laws should ideally be addressed by Parliament and advised the petitioners to consider modifying their plea to explore alternative legal approaches.

Disclaimer: This news/ article includes information received via a syndicated news feed. The original rights remain with the respective publisher.