Friday, 22, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 

Delhi High Court Grants Trademark Protection To Dream11 Owner Restraining Dreamz11


Dream11.png
30 Oct 2023
Categories: Human Rights News Intellectual Property News Latest News

The owner of the fantasy sports software "Dream11" filed a lawsuit, and the Delhi High Court has decreed in that action, noting that the contending defendants had a "clear and transparent intent" to duplicate the plaintiffs.

In light of the resemblances between the rival marks, their use for identical services, and the possibility of consumer misunderstanding, Justice C. Hari Shankar determined that a case of infringement under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, Section 29(2)(b).

The court concluded that "the defendants are consciously seeking to confuse persons into accessing the defendant's website instead of the plaintiff," noting further that the contending defendants had similarly duplicated the plaintiffs' mark and adopted the look and feel of their website.

The court concluded that "the defendants are consciously seeking to confuse persons into accessing the defendant's website instead of the plaintiff," noting further that the contending defendants had similarly duplicated the plaintiffs' mark and adopted the look and feel of their website.

Consequently, it was likewise decided that a case of passing off had been established.

Judge Shankar underlined that there was "every likelihood of confusion" between the competing marks because both were applied in the context of fantasy games, using the standard established in Re: Pianist Application.

At first, the plaintiffs, who are registered owners of the "dream11" trademarks and the owners of the domain "www.dream11.com," initiated the lawsuit to protest the defendants' use of the phonetically identical mark "dreamz11."

The plaintiffs claimed that the opposing defendants were blatantly duplicating them to provide the same services (fantasy sports) based on comparing the parties' domain names, websites, and Facebook pages. According to reports, defendant No. 1 was discovered to have been using pictures of cricket players from the plaintiffs' group, including Rishbh Pant, Rohit Sharma, and Hardik Pandya, on its website.



Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter