Meaning of the Cheque
A cheque is a negotiable instrument and bill of exchange which acts as a written instruction to the bank to pay a certain amount of money from the drawer’s bank account to the payee to whom the cheque is issued. It is an unconditional and definite order to the bank, payable on demand and it can be transferred by mere hand delivery. As per the Section 6 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881, “A cheque is a bill of exchange drawn on specific banker and not expressed to be payable otherwise than on demand and it includes electronic image of truncated cheque and a cheque in electronic from.”[i] Truncated cheque is a cheque which is converted into an electronic image by bank or clearing house for the purpose of easier transmission substituting physical cheque. An electronic cheque is a cheque that is drawn in electronic form Making payment through cheque is safe and convenient. However, cheques are not legal tender and a person can refuse to accept them.
Following are the parties to a cheque[ii] -
Components of Cheque[iii]
Uses of a Cheque
A cheque is used as a mode of payment as an alternative to cash. It is used for making bill payments, transfer of money between two entities or persons. It a enables monetary transaction between two parties without any physical exchange of currency. Cheques are considered a safer and more convenient way of money transfer when a large sum of money is to be transferred. Cheques can also be used by the drawer to withdraw money from his/her own account.[iv] Cheques are also used as a bill of exchange. Cheques can also be issued as collateral security.
Is cheque money?
Since a cheque is a negotiable instrument, it is considered fiduciary money, fiduciary money refers to the money backed by the mutual trust between the payer and the payee. Cheques are not considered as legal tender money in India which means it is not a compulsion to anyone to accept cheques as a mode to settle transaction. Cheques are just instructions to the bank to transfer a certain sum of money from the drawer’s account to the beneficiary subject to sufficient balance in the drawer’s bank account. According to RBI, cheques is not cash as it does not assure finality of payment.[v]
How does a cheque work?
In the cheque clearing process, a cheque is first deposited by the payee in the bank, then this cheque is sent to the branch of the bank where they are drawn through clearing house. The clearing house is responsible for the net settlement of funds between the presenting bank and drawee bank and the debit or credit position of the banks is determined. After receiving the cheque, Drawee bank checks whether the cheque is genuine or not. After analysing its genuineness cheque is passed, subject to the availability of the funds in the Drawer’s account. If a cheque is unpaid due to any reason, it is returned to the presenting banking, stating the reason of return.[vi] However, this traditional cheque clearing process is nowadays is getting replaced by Cheque Truncation System. The CTS Clearing process eliminates the actual flow of cheques between the banks and instead electronic image of the cheque is used for the clearing process. The new CTS technology has reduced the time and risk involved in the cheque clearing process.[vii]
Types of Cheques[viii]
What is the timeline to present a cheque?
The validity of the cheque to be presented in the bank is three months to the date mentioned in the cheque in India earlier it was six months. After the expiry of three month period the cheque will become a stale cheque.
Dishonour of Cheque
What is bouncing of Cheque?
Bouncing of cheques is a situation in which a cheque is presented to the bank and it cannot be processed or honoured due to several reasons. Non-sufficient fund in the drawer’s account is the primary reason for bounced cheque. A bounced cheque is also known as dishonoured cheque or bad cheque.
Reasons for cheque bouncing
There can be multiple reasons for cheque bouncing. Some these reasons are insufficient funds in the account of the issuer, mismatched signature of the drawer, signing at the wrong place in the cheque (signing on MICR Band present on the cheque), mistakes in the date of the cheque. The difference in the amount mentioned in the words and the amount in numbers is another reason for cheque bounce. Any type of overwriting or damage to cheque can also be the reason of cheque bouncing.[ix]
Penalty for Bouncing of Cheque
As per the Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, dishonour of cheque due to insufficient fund in drawer’s account is a criminal offence. Drawer can be punished with imprisonment for up to two years, and/or a fine up to twice the amount of cheque bounced.[x] A civil suit can also be filed against the drawer for the recovery of cheque bounced amount. Banks can also charge some amount as a penalty for themselves in case of bouncing of the cheque.
What can be done in case of cheque bounce?
In case of the cheque bounce a legal complaint under the Section 138 can be filed by the holder of the cheque against the drawer. A holder can also file a civil suit against the drawer for the recovery of the amount simultaneously. In case of bouncing of a cheque due to some mistake in the writing of cheque such as an error in name, date amount, holder can ask the drawer to issue a new cheque in the favour of holder.[xi]
Legal Notice for dishonour of cheque
A legal notice under the Section 138 of the Act can be issued by the holder to the drawer when a cheque is bounced due to insufficient funds. The holder can issue such notice within 30 days of his knowledge of dishonour of cheque. The objective of notice is to give drawer a chance to rectify his mistake and to protect an honest drawer. The holder cannot issue a legal notice to the drawer if the cheque is bounced due to any other reason except insufficient funds.
Notice of Dishonour to whom
The notice of the dishonour to the drawee of the cheque is not necessary to make them liable. Notice of dishonour must be given to all parties other than the drawee whom the holder seeks to make liable. The holder can give notice to both his immediate transferor or the drawer himself. Notice from indorser to drawer acts as a notice to the drawer from holder.[xii]
Service of Notice
As per the Section 94 of the Act, a notice of dishonour of cheque can be given to the authorised agent of the person to whom holder seeks to make liable, his legal representative in case he has died. Such notice of dishonour can be given in written (sent by post), oral, or any other form (even as email communication) but it should convey expressly that the cheque has been dishonoured and what will be the liability of the receiver. It should be given within a reasonable time.[xiii]
What to do after sending Legal Notice?
After sending the legal notice, holder has to give 15-day time to the drawer to pay the amount of bounced cheque, if the drawer does not make payment within the 15 days period, the holder can initiate a legal action within 30 days of the expiry of the notice period of 15 days.
What is the Procedure of filling a complaint?
Process of cheque bounce suit[xiv]-
Essential documents for a Cheque Bounce case
Documents required in cheque bounce case are-
Limitation period in cheque dishonour cases
Under the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 the limitation period to send a notice to drawer upon dishonour of cheque is 30 days within the receipt of information of cheque dishonour from the bank. The limitation period to make payment to the holder after receiving the notice is 15 days and the limitation period to file a legal complaint against the drawer if the payment is not received within the notice period is 30 days from the date of expiry of 15 days’ notice period.
Jurisdiction of Courts
As per section 142(2)(a) of the Negotiable Instrument Act, “the court within whose branch of the bank where the payee maintains the account is situated, will have jurisdiction to try the offence, if the cheque is delivered for collection through an account.” [Himalaya Self Farming Group v. Goyal Feed Suppliers, SC]
Court’s Fee
No uniform provision exists across the different states of India with respect to court fees. In the absence of such a blanket provision, they vary from one state to another, although the amount is not abundant. The amount also depends on the value declared in the cheque and therefore may vary accordingly even within the same state. SC held in the case of Surinder Singh Deswal and ors. v. Virender Gandhi and anr , Justices Ashok Bhushan and MR Shah held that the accused had to deposit 20% of the amount for the cheque bounce. It was emphasised that section 148 of the NI Act can have retrospective effect, meaning thereby that the court had the power to order the defaulters to deposit an amount while the cheque bounce case is still pending.
Cognizance of Offence
Section 142 of the NI Act, 1881 provides for the cognizance of an offence covered under section 138, that is, when the cheque, presented within a time period of 3 months from the day it is drawn, is dishonoured due to insufficient funds in discharge of a legally enforceable liability or a debt. The punishment awarded is imprisonment up to 2 years or fine twice the amount in the dishonoured cheque or both.
Under section 142, only a written complaint is taken cognizance of by the court. The complaint must be filed within one month from its occurrence. Also, only a Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of first class or a higher court can try cases filed under section 138.
Section 142 further provides for the territorial jurisdiction. It states that the court within whose local jurisdiction the branch of the bank, where the account of payee (holder in due course) or drawer is maintained, is located has the power to inquire into and try any case under section 138.
Is it important io hire a Lawyer in Cheque Bounce cases?
Cases of cheque bounce may end with the pressing of criminal charges, and the criminal penalties are laid out in section 138 of the NI Act. The role of a lawyer in such a case becomes important in preventing the client from making mistakes that might lead to significant financial and legal harm. Since the first step after the cheque has been dishonoured, within the next 30 days, is not to file a legal complaint in the Police Station but to send a formal notice demanding the amount be paid, hiring a lawyer is optional is at this stage. However, to ensure the legal language is correct and effective in communicating the intent of the drawee, hiring a lawyer to draft it is often advised. The time period mentioned in the notice should be for 15 days, within which if the amount is not paid, the next stage of taking legal action under the NI Act, 1881 comes into picture. In the same note, to ensure that the complaint is properly filed and all the documents of evidence, like the original cheque, cheque return memo, legal notice, etc. supporting the fact that there exists a liability that is unpaid, are forwarded, assistance of a lawyer experienced in such cases is deemed helpful.
Due to the possibility of attracting criminal charge against the drawer exists; involvement of a lawyer is of critical importance in the drafting of the legal notice, filing of the complaint and in defending before the court. Only in the last case, is the presence of a lawyer mandatory. His/her role also extends to allow client to focus on his business and other responsibilities by relieving him of the burden of all the paperwork. Presence of a lawyer decreases the probability that the interests of the accused/complainant are protected according to the law.
Whether it is a Criminal Offence?
A cheque bounce or dishonour is a criminal offence punishable with imprisonment up to 2 years and a fine double up to twice the amount of the actual amount in the cheque that has been dishonoured or both [section 138 of the NI Act, 1881].
Three conditions need to be satisfied for section 138 to apply-
Punishment for Cheque Bouncing
The drawer or signatory of the dishonoured cheque can attract criminal penalties of a term of imprisonment of maximum 2 years and a fine which is twice the amount of cheque or both.
Whether Criminal and Civil Case can be filed simultaneously?
Yes, a simultaneous case of civil and criminal charges can be filed for a case of cheque bounce. In the case of Vishnu Dutt Sharma v Daya Sapra, SC held: “There cannot be any doubt or dispute that a creditor can maintain a civil and criminal proceeding at the same time. Both proceedings, thus, can run parallel. The fact required to be proved to obtain a decree in the civil suit and a judgment of conviction in the criminal proceedings may overlap, but the standard of proof in a criminal case vis-a-vis a civil suit, indisputably is different. Whereas in a criminal case the prosecution is bound to prove the commission of the offence on the part of the accused beyond any reasonable doubt; in a civil suit ‘preponderance of probability’ would serve the purpose for obtaining a decree.”
Circumstances where Cheque Bounce is not an Offence?
In the following cases, dishonoured cheques do not amount to an offence-
Whether single complaint can be filed for multiple Cheque Bounce?
A single complaint is only allowed for up to 3 dishonoured cheques. Therefore, for example, if there are 4 cheques that have bounced, 2 complaints will have to be filed. In case of 7 dishonoured cheques, 3 cases will have to be filed and so on.
What happens when accused is ready to deposit the amount?
Case proceedings can be closed by the Court if the accused promises to pay the assessed amount (cheque amount along with interest and additional costs).
Landmark Judgements under Section 138 of NI Act
The respondent (accused) had given the appellant (complainant) a cheque drawn in Chandigarh. The complainant presented it at its bank in Indore where it bounced after which proceedings under section 128 of the NI Act were initiated at Indore. The respondent contended that the court of Indore did not have any jurisdiction to try the case since the cheque was drawn in Chandigarh. The High Court accepted the respondent’s argument, applying the Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod case (2014) 9 SCC 129, and said that the jurisdiction was with the court in whose jurisdiction the drawee’s bank account was maintained viz. Chandigarh. The Supreme Court held that section 142 (2)(a) provided that in determining the territorial jurisdiction, the place of delivery of cheque and collecting of the amount, both were to be considered. The Supreme Court, therefore, held that the Dashrath case would not stand in way of appellant insofar as territorial jurisdiction for initiating proceedings in cases of cheque bounce was concerned. After the promulgation of the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Second Ordinance, 2015, Indore court, within whose jurisdiction laid the bank which intimated the dishonouring to the appellant, had the territorial jurisdiction to take cognizance of the offence and start proceedings.
The SC held in this case where the cheque was issued to repay the loan advanced by the complainant, the burden of proof was on the complainant to draw a presumption under section 119 read with section 139 of NI Act. The complainant should have proved that he had requisite funds for the advancement of the Rs.1,50,000/- to the accused, that the accused issued the cheque to repay that loan, and that the accused had agreed towards such an arrangement. However, in the present case the complainant could not prove the date and place of the advancement and made contradictory statements in cross-examination as to who wrote the cheque. The accused was therefore acquitted.
Held the gravity of complaint under NI Act cannot be equated with an offence under the provisions of the Penal Code, 1860 or other criminal offences.
It was held in this case by the Supreme Court that the standard of proof necessary to rebut the assumptions of section 118 and 139 is not as high as that required of the prosecution. Doctrine of preponderance of probabilities applies.
The SC held that issuance of notice alone was not sufficient and that communication of the same was mandatory. Also, only after the notice has been served and there has been a failure of payment within the next 15 days, can the offence under section 138 be said to be completed.
[i] Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, § 6, No. 26, Acts of Parliament, 1881 (India).
[ii] Cheque, BUSINESS JARGONS, https://businessjargons.com/cheque.html (last visited Sep. 27, 2021).
[iii] Sushma Singh, How to write a Cheque in India? (The Right Way), MONEYMINT. (Aug. 10, 2020), https://moneymint.com/correct-way-to-write-a-cheque-in-india/.
[iv] Julia Kagan, Check, INVESTOPEDIA. (Aug. 10, 2021), https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/check.asp.
[v] Reserve Bank of India, Payment Instruments in India (1998), https://rbi.org.in/Scripts/PublicationsView.aspx?id=156 (last visited Sep. 28, 2021).
[vi] Sonali, Cheque clearing process in India, ALL BANKING INFO. (Aug. 25, 2020), https://www.allbankinginfo.com/2020/08/cheque-clearing-process.html?m=1#point1
[vii] Reserve Bank of India, Cheque Truncation System (2020), https://m.rbi.org.in/scripts/FAQView.aspx?Id=63 (last visited Sep. 28, 2021).
[viii] Cheque, supra note 2.
[ix] Cheque Bounce, PAISABAZZAR. (Jun. 11, 2020), https://www.paisabazaar.com/banking/cheque-bounce/.
[x] Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, § 138, No. 26, Acts of Parliament, 1881 (India).
[xi] Consequences of Cheque Bounce Notice, CLEARTAX. (May. 27, 2021), https://cleartax.in/s/consequences-cheque-bounce-notice
[xii] Bimal N. Patel et al., Banking Law and Negotiable Instruments Act ( Eastern Book Company 2015).
[xiii] Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, § 94, No. 26, Acts of Parliament, 1881 (India).
[xiv] Consequences of Cheque Bounce Notice, CLEARTAX. (May. 27, 2021), https://cleartax.in/s/consequences-cheque-bounce-notice
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!