Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
BARE ACTS

Supreme Court (SC) Judgements on IPC Section 228. Intentional insult or interruption to public servant sitting in judicial proceeding

 

List of Judgements

TOFAN SINGH vs. STATE OF TAMIL NADU

Judgement Date : october/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 582 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALStatement to Police Officer - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - An officer acting under Section 53 of the NDPS Act is considered a police officer - Any confessional statement made to such officers is not admissible as evidence.A. Constitution of India, 1950, Article 20(3) - Nar...

M/S MAGMA FINCORP LTD. vs. RAJESH KUMAR TIWARI

Judgement Date : october/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 538 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTHire Purchase - When the agreement between the Financier and the hirer allows the Financier to reclaim the vehicle financed, there are no legal barriers preventing the Financier from taking possession of the vehicle. Therefore, if the Financier takes possession of the vehicle, it cannot be...

M/S BANDEKAR BROTHERS PVT.LTD. vs. PRASAD VASSUDEV KENI

Judgement Date : september/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 491 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALCreation of False Evidence - A private complaint regarding offenses under Sections 191/192 of the IPC is not valid if the false evidence is fabricated outside the courtroom.A. Under the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Sections 190, 195, and 340, and the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 191, 1...

Sh. Narendra Kumar Srivastava Vs. State of Bihar

Judgement Date : february/2019, Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 84 SC

Amit Vashistha Vs. Suresh and Another [August 31, 2017]

Judgement Date : august/2017, Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 620 SC

Kanwar Singh Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan & ANR. [October 16, 2012]

Judgement Date : october/2012, Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 599 SC

Union of India & Ors. Vs. Brigadier P.S. Gill [March 23, 2012]

Judgement Date : march/2012, Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 195 SC

Kanwar Natwar Singh Vs. Directorate of Enforcement & ANR. (5 October 2010)

Judgement Date : october/2010, Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 736 SC

Union of India Vs. Padam Narain Aggarwal Etc. [2008] INSC 1704 (3 October 2008)

Judgement Date : october/2008, Citation : 2008 Latest Caselaw 863 SC

Daroga Singh & Ors Vs. B.K. Pandey [2004] Insc 260 (13 April 2004)

Judgement Date : april/2004, Citation : 2004 Latest Caselaw 257 SC

Arun Paswan, S.I. Vs. State of Bihar & Ors [2003] INSC 633 (12 December 2003)

Judgement Date : december/2003, Citation : 2003 Latest Caselaw 625 SC

Prakash H. Jain Vs. Ms. Marie Fernandes [2003] INSC 465 (23 September 2003)

Judgement Date : september/2003, Citation : 2003 Latest Caselaw 460 SC

T. Sudhakar Prasad Vs. Govt. of A.P. & Ors [2000] INSC 654 (13 December 2000)

Judgement Date : december/2000, Citation : 2000 Latest Caselaw 649 SC

Jamaat-E-Islami Hind Vs. Union of India [1994] INSC 644 (7 December 1994)

Judgement Date : december/1994, Citation : 1994 Latest Caselaw 638 SC

K.T.M.S. Mohd. & ANR Vs. Union of India [1992] INSC 124 (28 April 1992)

Judgement Date : april/1992, Citation : 1992 Latest Caselaw 124 SC

Headnote :

The Enforcement Directorate in Madras, upon receiving information that appellant-1 was involved in the illegal distribution of funds, conducted a raid at his premises on October 19, 1966, and seized Rs. 4,28,713. On the same day, both appellant-1 and his brother-in-law, appellant-2, were questioned...

Dr. Baliram Waman Hiray Vs. Justice B. Lentin & Ors [1988] INSC 270 (12 September 1988)

Judgement Date : september/1988, Citation : 1988 Latest Caselaw 267 SC

Headnote :

On February 21, 1986, the Maharashtra State Government appointed Shri Justice B. Lentin as a sole Commission of Inquiry to investigate the deaths of 14 patients at the government-operated J.J.B. Hospital between January 22 and February 7, 1986, following the administration of contaminated glycerol,...

R.K. Garg, Advocate Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh [1981] INSC 99 (22 April 1981)

Judgement Date : april/1981, Citation : 1981 Latest Caselaw 99 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, a practicing Advocate, represented the petitioner in a case filed under the Rent Act. When the case was called for hearing, the Judge observed that the petitioner had failed to pay the process fee, preventing the issuance of summons to the respondent. Consequently, the Judge dismissed...

Balkishan A. Devidayal Vs. State Of Maharashtra [1980] INSC 142 (31 July 1980)

Judgement Date : july/1980, Citation : 1980 Latest Caselaw 142 SC

Headnote :

In response to the allegations that the appellant in the Criminal Appeal, along with two other accused individuals, possessed railway property obtained through forged railway receipts, the Inspector of the Railway Protection Force filed a complaint against the three, asserting that they were guilty...

State of U.P. Vs. Durga Prasad [1974] INSC 155 (23 August 1974)

Judgement Date : august/1974, Citation : 1974 Latest Caselaw 153 SC

Headnote :

The individual in question was employed as a turner at the Railway workshop and was discovered to be in possession of Railway property. The Sub-Inspector of the Railway Protection Force conducted an inquiry into the matter under section 8(1) of the Act. During this inquiry, he recorded statements fr...

Percy Rustam Basta Vs. State of Maharashtra [1971] INSC 77 (16 March 1971)

Judgement Date : march/1971, Citation : 1971 Latest Caselaw 77 SC

Headnote :

The appellant was found guilty of offenses under the Customs Act, 1962. He contested the validity of his conviction, arguing that his statement to the customs officials, made in response to a summons issued under section 108 of the Act and which formed a significant basis for the conviction, should...

Hira H. Advani Vs. State of Maharashtra [1969] INSC 179 (13 August 1969)

Judgement Date : august/1969, Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 179 SC

Headnote :

The appellants, along with two others, faced prosecution based on a complaint from the Assistant Collector of Customs in Bombay for conspiracy and substantive offenses under section 167(81) of the Sea Customs Act and section 5 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act of 1947. The complaint alleged t...

Illias Vs. Collector of Customs, Madras [1968] INSC 266 (31 October 1968)

Judgement Date : october/1968, Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 266 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, along with several others, faced charges for various offenses related to the transportation of gold. The confessional statements they made to customs authorities under sections 107 and 108 were intended to be presented as evidence during the trial. The issue at hand was whether the cu...

Romesh Chandra Mehta Vs. State of West Bengal [1968] INSC 255 (18 October 1968)

Judgement Date : october/1968, Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 255 SC

Headnote :

The defendants faced charges for various offenses under Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code in conjunction with Section 167(81) of the Sea Customs Act of 1878, Section 5 of the Import and Export Control Act of 1947, specific violations of the Sea Customs Act, and offenses under Sections 108 and 1...

Lalji Haridas Vs. State of Maharashtra & ANR [1964] INSC 31 (7 February 1964)

Judgement Date : february/1964, Citation : 1964 Latest Caselaw 31 SC

Headnote :

The appellant lodged a criminal complaint against respondent No. 2, claiming that he had violated section 193 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 by providing false testimony in certain proceedings before the Income-tax Officer under section 37 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. Respondent No. 2 raised...

Indo-China Steam Navigation Co. Ltd. Vs. Jasjit Singh, Additional Collector of Customs & Ors [1964] INSC 26 (3 February 1964)

Judgement Date : february/1964, Citation : 1964 Latest Caselaw 26 SC

Headnote :

The appellant operates a business that involves the transportation of goods and passengers by sea and possesses a fleet of ships for this purpose. One of its vessels, named Eastern Saga, docked at Calcutta and was inspected by the Calcutta Customs Officers.During the inspection of the sailors\' quar...

Raja Ram Jaiswal Vs. State of Bihar [1963] INSC 86 (4 April 1963)

Judgement Date : april/1963, Citation : 1963 Latest Caselaw 110 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, along with five others, including the driver, was traveling in a car owned by the appellant\'s brother. The Excise Inspector stopped the vehicle, conducted a search, and found five bundles of Ganja—four in the luggage compartment and one in the leg space in front of the car\'s seat....

Dhrangadhra Chemical Works Ltd. Vs. The Dhrangadhra Municipality [1959] INSC 90 (19 may 1959)

Judgement Date : may/1959, Citation : 1959 Latest Caselaw 90 SC

Headnote :

The Municipality in question issued a notice under subsection (1) of section 153A of the Bombay District Municipal Act, 1901, as modified for the State of Saurashtra and amended by Act XI of 1955, requiring the appellant to explain why it should not be ordered to discharge the effluent from its chem...

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Revashankar [1958] INSC 83 (24 September 1958)

Judgement Date : september/1958, Citation : 1958 Latest Caselaw 83 SC

Headnote :

The complainant, who had lodged a grievance regarding an alleged offense under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code in the Court of the Additional District Magistrate of Indore, made several serious allegations against the Magistrate in an application submitted under Section 528 of the Code of Crimi...

Inayat Ullah Vs. The Custodian, Evacuee Property [1957] INSC 93 (30 October 1957)

Judgement Date : october/1957, Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 93 SC

Headnote :

The appellant and his brother inherited certain properties from their father. After the brother\'s death, the appellant claimed to be the sole heir. However, the respondent issued a notice under Section 7 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950, regarding the brother\'s share, citing tha...