In a recent development, the Supreme Court of India has rejected a petition seeking to restrain a coalition of 26 political parties from utilizing the acronym & I.N.D.I.A. (Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance) as the moniker for their alliance. The bench, presided over by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, dismissed the plea on the grounds that it appeared to be primarily motivated by a quest for publicity.
During the proceedings, Justice Kaul inquired about the petitioner's standing, stating, "Who are you? What is your interest? If there is a violation of election norms, go to the Election Commission. You want publicity, complete publicity." The court remarked that it was not within its purview to determine the morality of political matters and expressed disappointment that valuable time was being expended on this issue.
The petitioner contended that the use of such a name was morally objectionable. However, Justice Kaul reaffirmed the court's stance, asserting, "We are not going to determine morality in politics.
The court also acknowledged that the petitioner had highlighted the submission of applications before the Election Commission of India, implying that the proper forum for addressing such matters is the election regulatory body.
As the petitioner sought to withdraw the case, the bench granted the request and dismissed the petition. The plea had additionally urged the Press Council of India to enact regulations preventing media agencies from employing the name I.N.D.I.A. to designate the Opposition alliance.
The plea had put forth several arguments, contending:- The usage of slogans by party members aimed to falsely portray that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) was opposed to the nation INDIA in the forthcoming elections. - The proliferation of these slogans and statements in both national and international media not only undermined democratic principles but also seemed to manipulate public sentiment for political gain.
- The adoption of the nation name for individual political agendas was deemed ethically questionable, allegedly masquerading as a nationalistic approach. - The petitioner invoked the *Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act* of 1950, which prohibits the registration of the name INDIA.
Picture Source :
