Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2456 UK
Judgement Date : 27 March, 2026
Office Notes, reports,
orders or proceedings
SL.
Date or directions and COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No
Registrar's order with
Signatures
WPSB No.396 of 2023
Shaveta Kohli ..........Petitioner
Vs.
Uttarakhand Public Service
Commission and others ..............Respondents
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Harendra Belwal, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
3. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, learned counsel for respondent- Selecting Body, through video conferencing.
4. Mr. Vinod Tiwari, learned counsel for respondent no.4.
5. Learned counsel appearing for the Selecting Body submits that the education qualification/mark sheet submitted by all the candidates for the post of Scientific Officer, was placed before an Expert Committee and based on the opinion of such Committee, respondent no.4 was found to eligible.
6. Learned counsel however could not give any answer to the query posed by us regarding the number of candidates who had applied for the said post having M.Sc. Forensic Science with specialization in Chemistry and also other qualifications namely, M.Sc. Chemistry/Analytical Chemistry/Toxicology.
7. Learned counsel for the Selecting Body is therefore required to get definite information regarding the number of candidates having different qualification, as mentioned in the advertisement for the post in-question.
8. Learned counsel for the Selecting Body is directed to file a supplementary affidavit clarifying the aforesaid aspect within two weeks.
9. List this case on 16.04.2026.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 27.03.2026 SK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!