Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1217 UK
Judgement Date : 18 February, 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA
AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY
SPECIAL APPEAL NO. 368 OF 2023
18TH FEBRUARY, 2026
Prakriti Maulekhi ...... Appellant
Versus
Union of India and others ...... Respondents
Counsel for the appellant : Mr. Suman Negi and Mr. B.S.
Koranga, learned counsel
Counsel for the respondents : Mr. Ketan Joshi, learned counsel for
respondent Nos. 2 and 3
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
1. By order dated 16.05.2025, this Court directed
the respondent School to forthwith grant admission to the
appellant pending final disposal of the appeal. The
respondents subjected the said order to challenge before the
Supreme Court by filing Special Leave Petition (C) No.
25403 of 2025. However, the Supreme Court declined to
interfere with the order of this Court and dismissed the SLP
by order dated 12.09.2025.
2. One of the contentions of learned counsel for the
appellant is that although the medical board and review
medical board have found that there does not appear any
physical inability on part of the appellant to undertake
different activities but in view of the disease being of
congenital nature they have observed that there is likelihood
of the same manifesting itself later on in the life. The
medical board and review medical board were admittedly
headed by only an orthopedic doctor and not by any expert
in the field of congenital abnormalities.
3. Counsel for the parties agree that the Court may
seek opinion of some expert body in this regard.
4. Accordingly, we provide that the Director, All
India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi shall
constitute a medical board headed by an expert in the field
of congenital abnormalities, and another expert from the
department of orthopedic. If he feels that expert from some
other field would also be relevant it shall be open to the
Director, AIIMS to include any such expert in the body of
experts. Learned counsel for the appellant states that the
appellant would appear before the board on any date that is
fixed by this Court and, preferably in this month only, to
which learned counsel for the respondents has no objection.
5. Accordingly, we direct that the medical board
shall be constituted within a week from today. The order
will be communicated to the Director, AIIMS, New Delhi by
the office within 48 hours with request to constitute the
medical board. The appellant will be examined by the
medical board on 10.03.2026.
6. As we are informed that the appellant has already
passed Standard 8th and, even Standard 9th, from a different
school but she is ready to take admission again in Standard
9th and in respect of which even approval of the Sainik
School Cell, Ministry of Defence would not be required,
therefore, we further provide that if in the meantime the
appellant makes any application for admission in Standard
9th along with necessary documents, the respondents in
compliance of the order passed by this Court dated
16.05.2025 would grant admission to the appellant subject
to the final outcome of the instant appeal.
7. The Director, AIIMS, New Delhi is requested to
transmit the report of the experts in a sealed cover to the
Registrar General of this Court within one week from the
date the appellant is examined.
8. List the matter on 17.03.2026.
_______________________ MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.
_________________ SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.
Dt: 18TH FEBRUARY, 2026 Negi
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!