Monday, 13, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Madarsa Faizul Uloom vs State Of Uttarakhand
2026 Latest Caselaw 1135 UK

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1135 UK
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Uttarakhand High Court

Madarsa Faizul Uloom vs State Of Uttarakhand on 17 February, 2026

Author: Pankaj Purohit
Bench: Pankaj Purohit
                                                                                                  2026:UHC:1007

                Office Notes,
             reports, orders or
SL.           proceedings or
      Date                                                 COURT'S OR JUDGE'S ORDERS
No.            directions and
             Registrar's order
              with Signatures

                                  WPMS No.357 of 2026
                                  Madarsa Faizul Uloom                            ...........Petitioner
                                                                Vs.
                                  State of Uttarakhand
                                  and others                                ...........Respondents

                                  Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.

Mr. Shariq Khurshid, Advocate for the petitioner.

2. Mr. Suyash Pant, S.C. for the State.

3. Mr. Davesh Bishnoi, Advocate for respondent no.2.

4. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, whereby the petitioner has sought a writ of mandamus to permanently unseal the premises of the petitioner's Madarsa/Maktab situated at Mohalla Alli Khan, Kashipur, District-Udham Singh Nagar on his giving an undertaking to the respondent-Authority that in future petitioner will not operate Madarsa in-question without due recognition by the State under the rules and regulations.

5. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his case is covered by the judgment and order of the Co-ordinate Bench dated 26.08.2025 in WPMS No.835 of 2025, Madarsa Inamul Ulum Society Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others, and batch of writ petitions.

6. Learned counsel for the State does not dispute the contention made by learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter is covered by the 2026:UHC:1007

aforesaid judgment.

7. Accordingly writ petition stands disposed of in light of aforesaid judgment and order.

(Pankaj Purohit, J.) 17.02.2026 SK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter