Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1043 UK
Judgement Date : 13 February, 2026
2026:UHC:913-DB
Office Notes,
reports, orders or
SL. proceedings or
Date COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No directions and
Registrar's order
with Signatures
WPSB No.230 of 2020
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Akshay Pradhan, learned counsel for petitioner.
2. Mr. Pradeep Hairiya, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/respondents.
3. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought for the following relief:-
1. To issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to not to proceed with the departmental enquiry started pursuant to the charge-sheet dated 06.06.2019 in the light of the fact that the charge-
sheet has already been set aside by the department itself vide order dated 28.11.2019.
4. The relief claimed by the petitioner cannot be granted. Once charge-sheet is issued against the government servant, then the disciplinary enquiry must be brought to its logical end as early as possible.
5. Thus, the writ petition is thoroughly misconceived, therefore, the same is dismissed.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 13.02.2026 PN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!