Monday, 13, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

April vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others
2026 Latest Caselaw 2597 UK

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2597 UK
Judgement Date : 1 April, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Uttarakhand High Court

April vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others on 1 April, 2026

Author: Pankaj Purohit
Bench: Pankaj Purohit
                                                       2026:UHC:2297



HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
        Writ Petition Misc. Single No. 791 of 2026
                            01 April, 2026
Ms Kedar Ghati                                          --Petitioner
                               Versus
State Of Uttarakhand and Others                      --Respondents
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Presence:-
     Mr. Mahendra Singh Rawat, learned counsel for petitioner.
     Ms. Swati Verma, learned Brief Holder for the State of
     Uttarakhand/respondent No.1.
     Mr. Bhupendra Bisht, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2
     and 3/Nagar Palika Parishad Nainital.

Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J. (Oral)

This writ petition has been filed by petitioner seeking a direction to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to forthwith released petitioner's outstanding bill of Rs.2,41,900/- along with interest @18% per annum from the date of submission of the bill till the date of actual payment.

2. It is the contention of petitioner that the petitioner was given a work order on 18.09.2023, wherein, petitioner has to cover the Maa Nanda Devi Mahotsav 2023 by a documentary film/short film. The said task was completed by the petitioner and the petitioner submitted the final bill of Rs.2,41,900/- to respondent Nos.2 and 3.

3. The present writ petition has been filed by petitioner on the ground that almost for two and a half year, respondent Nos.2 and 3-Nagar Palika Parishad has not paid the aforesaid amount to petitioner, which he legally entitled to get. It is also

2026:UHC:2297 pleaded in the writ petition that the required amount is admissible to petitioner.

4. Per contra, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 submits that Nagar Palika Parishad Nainital is ready to make the payment of principal amount of Rs.2,41,900/- to petitioner, but due to financial crunch in Nagar Palika Parishad, the same could not have been paid.

5. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 undertakes that the Nagar Palika Parishad Nainital shall make the payment of principal amount of Rs.2,41,900/- to petitioner within four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

6. On the basis of undertaking given by learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3, this writ petition is finally disposed of. Respondent Nos.2 and 3-Nagar Palika Parishad Nainital is directed to pay the amount of Rs.2,41,900/- to petitioner within four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

(Pankaj Purohit, J.) 01.04.2026 PN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter