Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4480 UK
Judgement Date : 19 September, 2025
2025:UHC:8426-DB
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G. NARENDAR
AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY
Writ Petition Criminal No.1101 of 2025
19th September, 2025
Sabiya Khan & Another ----Petitioners
versus
State Of Uttarakhand and others ----Respondents
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Presence:-
Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners
Mr. J.S. Virk, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Rakesh Joshi, Brief Holder for the
State.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT:
(per Sri Subhash Upadhyay, J.)
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the
learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of
Uttarakhand.
2. It is submitted that both the petitioners belong to
the same religion; that the petitioners developed a
liking for each other, which has ended in marriage on
15.09.2025 according to Muslim rites and rituals, and
now both the petitioners are living together. Since the
family members and others relatives of the first
petitioner are against this marriage, they are giving out
threats to kill both the petitioners. Petitioners submit
2025:UHC:8426-DB
that they are facing stiff resistance, and they seriously
apprehend threat to their life and limb from the family
and other relatives of the first petitioner, and hence
they are before this Court praying for protection.
3. It is submitted by the learned Deputy Advocate
General for the State that both the petitioners are
major and that they have solemnized Nikah on
15.09.2025. The petitioners have also placed on record
marriage certificate dated 15.09.2025 as Annexure-1.
4. In that view of the matter, and in view of the
ruling of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata
Singh v. State of U.P. and another, (2006) 5 SCC
475, the petitioners have made out a case for grant of
protection.
5. The Station House Officer, Police Station Kotwali
Roorkee, District Haridwar is directed to assess the
threat, if any, to the life and limb of the petitioners,
and provide necessary protection, if it is found that
there is a threat to the life and limb of the petitioners.
The SHO is further directed to summon the private
respondents, and such other persons, who are
2025:UHC:8426-DB
inimically placed towards the marriage of the
petitioners, and counsel them, in accordance with law.
6. The Writ Petition stands ordered accordingly.
7. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(G. NARENDAR, C.J.)
(SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 19.09.2025 Rajni
RAJINI UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=97cfa6e4cbd49c07b876db4 8448ac3701a9ae475a2547e4b7f1d9b 1f17d01342, postalCode=263001,
GUSAIN st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=8D039BC77BD1A2222 B4DF4FC80D4557562F95BEBA013F53 0616A158A0A878BD8, cn=RAJINI GUSAIN Date: 2025.09.22 15:10:02 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!