Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Unknown vs Commissioner
2025 Latest Caselaw 4851 UK

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4851 UK
Judgement Date : 14 October, 2025

Uttarakhand High Court

Unknown vs Commissioner on 14 October, 2025

                                                          2025:UHC:9154-DB


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

     HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G. NARENDAR
                                    AND
        HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY
             Writ Petition (M/B) No.865 of 2025
                          14th October, 2025

Rajender GSTIN (05BHCPR7942G1Z6)                          ----Petitioner

                                  versus

Commissioner, State Goods & Services
Tax Commissionerate & Others                            ----Respondents

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Presence:-
Mr. Prince Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner
Ms. Puja Banga, learned Brief Holder for the State (through V.C.)
-------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDGMENT:

(per Sri G. NARENDAR, C.J.)

Learned counsel for the parties submit that

the instant writ petition could be disposed of in terms

of the judgment dated 17.03.2025, rendered in Writ

Petition (M/B) No.71 of 2025, which came to be passed

following the order in Writ Petition (S/B) No.39 of

2025, which reads as under:-

"Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Brief Holder for the State.

2) The facts are not in dispute. Both the counsels are at ad idem regarding the facts. Both the counsels submit that in similar facts a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court while disposing of Writ Petition (S/B) No. 39 of 2025 dated 24.02.2025, was pleased to hold and order as follows:

"Ms. Prabha Naithani, learned counsel for the

2025:UHC:9154-DB

petitioner.

2. Ms. Puja Banga, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand through video conferencing.

3. Petitioner is a taxable person, registered under GST Act, 2017. His GST registration has been cancelled by Assistant Commissioner, Haridwar- Sector 3 vide order dated 12.03.2024. Challenging the cancellation order, petitioner has filed this Writ Petition.

4. The show cause notice issued to the petitioner on 23.02.2024 reveals that cancellation has been ordered on account of petitioner's failure to furnish GST returns for prescribed period.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon a judgment rendered by learned Single Judge in Writ Petition (M/S) No. 3283 of 2024, whereby, petitioner in that case was permitted to make application for revocation of the cancellation order and the Competent Authority was directed to consider the application and pass appropriate order as per law, within four weeks thereafter.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a similar order be passed in the present case also.

7. Ms. Puja Banga, learned Brief Holder submits that she has no objection if petitioner is permitted to move appropriate application for revocation of cancellation order.

8. Accordingly, present writ petition is disposed of by permitting petitioner to move an application for revocation of the cancellation order. If he makes such application within two weeks from today and also furnishes all the pending returns and deposits unpaid tax along with interest and amount of penalty, the Competent Authority shall consider the petitioner's prayer for revocation as per law within four weeks from the date of receipt of such application."

2025:UHC:9154-DB

3) Both the counsels submit that the instant petitioner also being similarly situated as the petitioner in the aforesaid writ petition, the instant writ petition also be disposed of on 2 2025:UHC:5852-DB similar terms.

4) Submissions of both counsels are placed on record.

5) Writ petition is disposed of on the above terms as in Para 8 of the order dated 24.02.2025."

2. The submission of both the counsels is placed

on record.

3. The instant writ petition is disposed of in

terms of relief granted in Paragraph No.8 of the

judgment dated 24.02.2025, rendered in Writ Petition

(S/B) No.39 of 2025.

4. The writ petition stands ordered accordingly.

5. There shall be no order as to costs.

6. As a sequel thereto, pending application, if

any, shall stand closed.

(G. NARENDAR, C.J.)

(SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 14.10.2025 Rajni

RAJINI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=97cfa6e4cbd49c07b876db484 48ac3701a9ae475a2547e4b7f1d9b1f17

GUSAIN d01342, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=8D039BC77BD1A2222B 4DF4FC80D4557562F95BEBA013F5306 16A158A0A878BD8, cn=RAJINI GUSAIN Date: 2025.10.16 11:38:36 +05'30'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter