Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5326 UK
Judgement Date : 7 November, 2025
2025:UHC:9831-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G. NARENDAR
AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY
WRIT PETITION (CRL) NO. 1388 OF 2025
07TH NOVEMBER, 2025
Anjali Masih & another .....Petitioners.
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & others ....Respondents.
Counsel for the Petitioners : Ms. Manju Bahuguna and Mr. D.N.
Sharma, learned counsels.
Counsel for the State : Mr. R.K. Joshi, learned Brief Holder.
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:
(per Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sri G. Narendar)
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, and learned
Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
2. It is submitted that both the petitioners belong to the
same religion, and that the petitioners developed a liking for each
other, which has ended in marriage, and now both the petitioners
are living together. Since the family members and others relatives
of the first petitioner are against this marriage, they are giving out
threats to kill both the petitioners. Petitioners submit that they are
facing stiff resistance, and they seriously apprehend threat to their
life and limb from the family and other relatives of the first
petitioner, and hence they are before this Court praying for
protection.
3. The documents on record reveal that both the
petitioners are majors, and it is also submitted by the learned
Brief Holder for the State that the parties have performed their 2025:UHC:9831-DB
marriage on 17.10.2025. The petitioners have also placed on
record marriage certificate as Annexure-1.
4. In that view of the matter, and in view of the ruling of
the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh v. State of
U.P. and another, (2006) 5 SCC 475, the petitioners have
made out a case for grant of protection.
5. The Station House Officer, Police Station Rudrapur,
District Udham Singh Nagar is directed to assess the threat, if any,
to the life and limb of the petitioners, and provide necessary
protection, if it is found that there is a threat to the life and limb of
the petitioners. The SHO is further directed to summon the private
respondents, and such other persons, who are inimically placed
towards the marriage of the petitioners, and counsel them, in
accordance with law.
6. The Writ Petition stands ordered accordingly.
7. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(G. NARENDAR, C.J.)
(SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 07th November, 2025 NISHANT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!