Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2777 UK
Judgement Date : 22 May, 2025
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition (S/S) No.741 of 2025
Smt. Hemlata Rikhari ...Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others ....Respondents
Present:
Mr. Dinesh Gahtori, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Narain Dutt, Standing Counsel for the State.
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J.(Oral)
By means of instant petition, the petitioner has sought
the following reliefs:-
"(i) Issue a writ in the nature of cerciorari to quash the recovery mentioned in letter dated 26-3-2025 (Annexure No.1) issued by respondent no.5.
(ii) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to refund the recovered amount of Rs. 288896/ from the gratuity of the petitioner.
(iii) Issue any other suitable writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
(iv) Award the cost of the writ petition in favour of the petitioner."
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
record.
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner
would submit that the matter is squarely covered by the judgment
dated 04.01.2024, passed in WPSS No. 2269 of 2022, Shankar Singh
Bora Vs. State of Uttarakhand and other connected matters.
4. This fact is admitted by the learned State counsel.
5. Since the matter is covered, instant petition is decided in
terms of the judgment dated 04.01.2024, passed in WPSS No. 2269 of
2022, Shankar Singh Bora Vs. State of Uttarakhand and other
connected matters.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 22.05.2025 Jitendra
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!